Select your timezone:
Select
2014/01/26 15:24 Under (3.5) @-139 8/10
 

Trumpai. Ispanija. Primera division. Barcelona (2) priima Malaga (16). Is paskutiniu 5 macu, over 3.5 buvo 4 kartus, bet paskutini susitikima, Barcai zaidziant isvykoj buvo leidziama imusti tik viena, o namai liko be ivarciu. Siandien negalvoju, kad bus tik vienas, bet netikiu, kad turetu buti 4, manau namai padarys 1-2 golu ir ramiai temps maca, na o sveciai geriausiu atveju iridens viena, ko pasekoje, FT turetume isvysti 2:1 ar 2:0. Katalonu komandoje nezais gynejas Martinas Montoya ir saugai Andresas Iniesta, Alexas Songas. Nors puolimo grandis pilna, galinti musti daug, kazkaip nematau cia ju besiplesanciu 😁

  • Voted: 13
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

ModestasLT

Thanks: 3

Followers: 0

  • Units -8.14
  • ROI -7.83%
  • W% 57.14%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 14
  • Units won: 95.86
  • W-L-T : 8-6-0
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.43
  • Staked units: 104.00
  • Avg. Odds: -138
 

Unit change

104-2-8-14-202024 September2025 August

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Atletico Madrid - Elche

    Lukas2824 08/23 17:30 in 56 minutes
    (-1.5 Atletico Madrid) @-141 6/10
    The athletics lost in the first round and I am waiting for a reaction. It was a difficult first round, away with Espanyol, whose field is very small and few teams have won there this season, so it's not surprising that the result was not in their favor, even though they were the favorites. Taking into account the fact that the athletics are usually unstable away, while they rarely drop points at their own stadium, it is not likely that anything will change this year. Elche is a newly promoted club, and although they dominated the first match against Betis, they only managed to get a draw in front of their fans. I don't think they will have the same luck in this round, the Madrid club should win with at least 2 goals, they have a better team.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)