Select your timezone:
Select

Toronto Raptors - Washington Wizards

02/28 02:05 Aurimaz -8.00
2014/02/27 23:07 Under (198 daugiau) @-125 8/10
 

Raptors ir toliau maloniai stebina,su kuo besusitiktu ginyba tesiog ispudyngai veikia,ar tai butu isvyka ar sava arena,sitame mace manau nebus taip lengva raptors imti eiline pergale,nors ir 3-0 sustikimus bendrus laimi jie,per visus 3 susitikimus nei karto nebuvo permesta tiek tasku,daugiausia ka surinko tai 196,su cavs isvykos irgi laimeta del geros ginybos,nes per vargus vos 93 taskus sukrapste cavs,tad cia realiausia underis

  • Voted: 7
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

Aurimaz

Thanks: 117

Followers: 0

  • Units 199.65
  • ROI 2.99%
  • W% 48.71%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 875
  • Units won: 7031.65
  • W-L-T : 417-439-19
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.81
  • Staked units: 6832.00
  • Avg. Odds: 132.3
 

Unit change

2102041981921861802025 March2026 February

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (3)

    BOS Celtics - NY Knicks

    Kentukyo 02/08 17:30 in 31 minutes
    (NY Knicks) @145 10/10
    Boston seems invincible lately, but there aren't enough star players to sustain such form for long. Today, Anunoby and Towns return to NYK, so I expect them to have a much better game, especially since Boston is their direct opponent on the standings. I'm not sure if getting Vucevic really strengthens Boston, maybe even weakens them, considering their center will be completely exposed on defense.
    Read less
    Read more
    (NY Knicks) @125 6/10
    (Over 219.5) @170 10/10
    Although the teams haven't been very productive lately, it seems that Towns and Anunoby are returning to the Knicks today, and Hart will also be able to play. After the previous defeat, when they only scored 80 points against Detroit, some conclusions will be drawn and I am expecting more successful games, although such a high total in NBA and Knicks' games doesn't seem likely.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)