Select your timezone:
Select
2014/10/10 06:46 Benneteau @375 7/10
 

Nu čia pliusinę pasiimsiu stambiau, bet ir pergalę pasibandysiu. Fedeksas nu nebėra tokio žaidimo l;ygio, koks būdavo anksčiau, daromos klaidos servas irgi dirba ne be taip gerai. Čia turėjo kristi jau 1 rate, bet išsaugojo net 5MP , ir laimėjo, po to prieš Bautista pasiėmė užtikrintai, bet kad ispanas be servo, ir ne jo danga. Francas čia lošia puikų tenisą, servas eina puikiai, kas svarbiausia net 2 padavimu renkama daug taškų, ten prieš Dimka virš 80%, turi neblogą forehandą, gali ir palaikyti kamuoliuką, šiuo metu abejų formos tikrai apyligės, ir turi šansų francas.

  • Voted: 66
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

betass

Thanks: 903

Followers: 2

  • Units -289.94
  • ROI -0.76%
  • W% 39.82%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 4796
  • Units won: 39062.06
  • W-L-T : 1862-2814-120
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.21
  • Staked units: 39352.00
  • Avg. Odds: 186.2
 

Unit change

-260-272-284-296-308-3202024 September2025 August

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Grabher Julia - Vandewinkel Hanne

    matas 08/02 12:00 37 minutes ago
    Grabher Julia (setais 2:0) @-109 8/10
    ITF Hechingen tournament, clay
    Vandewinkel Hanne showed decent performance, however all three matches ended in three sets, so I think the Belgian player will have a significant advantage, especially considering their head-to-head record of 4:6; 1:6, which proves that Grabher is much stronger.
    Grabher Julia has been dominating easily lately, as in the six sets played, only once her opponent was able to win four games, while in all other matches they only managed to win two or three games. What I admire about Grabher's game is her consistent pace throughout the match, great stability, and overall technical skills. Additionally, her motivation is boosted by the possibility of playing against her compatriot Kraus in the final of this tournament.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)