Select your timezone:
Select
2015/01/10 18:50 Robredo, T @-227 8/10
 

Sveiki visi,

pirmiausiai tai kad Monacas kolkas visai nepazaidzia,servavo setui pries Kavciciu bet sugebejo pralosti maca 2-0,servas nera is greiciausiu ir stipriausiu,zaidimas letas,jeigu macas butu ant clay dangos manyciau kad Monacas galetu dar pakovoti,taciau dabar nematau jam sansu.
Robredo praeitu metu gale su stipriausiais dauzesi iki kiekvieno tasko,bei dauze geriausius kaip Nole,Murejus ir t.t.Servas yra,forhandas,backhandas yra,viskas stipru ir greita.

Sekmes

  • Voted: 48
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

TomasK

Thanks: 165

Followers: 1

  • Units 39.91
  • ROI 1.97%
  • W% 61.57%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 266
  • Units won: 2148.91
  • W-L-T : 157-98-11
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.93
  • Staked units: 2109.00
  • Avg. Odds: -129
 

Unit change

5044383226202025 September2026 August

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    Pedro Martinez - Daniil Glinka

    88Birds 08/25 19:30 59 minutes ago
    Pedro Martinez (Pedro Martinez handicap gamess (-1.5)) @-125 8/10
    The main argument for Pedro is that they recently played with Danil and Pedro won 2-0. Pedro has better results on hard court this season, and in general, they have a good series with 4 wins and 1 loss in their last 5 matches. Out of 11 played matches, Pedro has 9 wins. Both their ranking and form, as well as head-to-head, show that Martinez is the stronger player.
    Read less
    Read more
    Christopher O'Connell (Christopher O'Connell handicap gamess (-1.5)) @-149 8/10
    O'Connell has a lot of experience playing with serious players. He had a good run in Cincinnati, making it quite far. He won against Sweeny, Shevchenko, and Majchrzak, but later lost against the powerful Fritz. Sakellaridis played 6 matches last week. It is unclear how much energy he has left. Experience and a big advantage on break-points are on O'Connell's side (60% vs 36%).
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)