Select your timezone:
Select
2016/09/18 10:00 Over (Abi imus) @-105 7/10
 

Kof vertas rizikos. Watford namie duoda kovos kiekvienam varzovui. Si sezona visuose varzybose buvo btts. Ryskesniu traumuotu zaideju nera nei pas viena. Pl varzybose mu taip pat pasizymejo kas kart ( ibra musa golus nepailsdamas ). Nematau as cia dominavimo vienos puses ( 3;0 rezultato nelabai isivaziduoju ), bandau vaziuoti su btts, juo lab ir kof padoresnis nei o2.5

  • Voted: 4
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

Senelis

Thanks: 36

Followers: 0

  • Units -62.93
  • ROI -4.34%
  • W% 48.88%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 185
  • Units won: 1446.07
  • W-L-T : 87-91-7
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.16
  • Staked units: 1509.00
  • Avg. Odds: 108.3
 

Unit change

-50-56-62-68-74-802025 May2026 April

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    Chelsea - Manchester City

    Lukas2824 04/12 15:30 21 minutes ago
    (Over 3) @-120 6/10
    I am thinking whether to take City or Overi, but I will probably settle for Overiu. I believe City will score 3 goals. I don't believe Peru will change anything in the Chelsea camp, as this team still has an unstable defense, goalkeeper, and the leader James may not perform well. On the other hand, Chelsea can offer a solid offense, with players like Palmer, Estevao, Joao Pedro, and on a good day they can easily score goals against Blue and White at home. Both teams should focus on Peru, but I think Chelsea, as underdogs, will have a better chance.
    Read less
    Read more

    Chelsea - Manchester City

    Kentukyo 04/12 15:30 21 minutes ago
    (Manchester City) @-106 8/10
    Yesterday Arsenal gave them a chance to fight. City is 9 points behind, but has 2 games in hand. Both can win and there is only a 3 point difference to the title, so everything is possible. City simply cannot afford to miss out on this chance, while Chelsea has been struggling since their manager change.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)