Select your timezone:
Select
2016/11/05 13:11 West Ham (Under 2.5 goal) @400 5/10
 

Susitinka namai kuriems reikia zutbut Peru kad nors kiek atitruktu nuo pavojingos iškritimo zonos bei Stoke kuris kiek suprantu zais be Arnautovic ir Shaqiri be siu dviejų kertiniu zaideju Stoke puolimas tampa bedantis ir scoreti namam jiem manau snd prilygtu stebukluj bet aisku pasitaiko ir fuksu komandu statistika po 10 turu namu scoretu,praleistu santykis 10-19 sveciu 12-17 taigi statistiškai vienodai musancios ir prasileidancios ekipos galim sakyt cia manau bus namu Peru 1-0 arba max 2-0 Stoke be savo dviejų pagrindiniu zaideju nemanau kad puls be galvos i prieki labiau atvažiuos stengdamasis parsivest lygiasias

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

Herkus_mantas

Thanks: 60

Followers: 1

  • Units 4.41
  • ROI 0.15%
  • W% 49.85%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 351
  • Units won: 3046.41
  • W-L-T : 169-170-12
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.67
  • Staked units: 3042.00
  • Avg. Odds: 106.8
 

Unit change

201482-4-102025 January2025 December

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Brentford - Leeds

    Lukas2824 12/14 16:30 37 minutes ago
    (Over 2.5) @110 5/10
    I am amazed that we are getting 2 coefficients for 2.5 Over here. First of all, Brentford plays at home and they are a completely different team at home, not only in terms of being ranked 4th in the league, but also scoring 15 goals in 7 games, including 3 against top clubs such as Newcastle, Liverpool, and Manchester United, and 2 against Chelsea. They will be facing Leeds, a team fighting for survival, but now aiming for a high place in the standings after scoring 6 goals against Chelsea and Liverpool last week. They defend poorly in away games and even though we may not score much, I believe our current good offensive play will contribute to the total score. I also think there will be both teams scoring and it will be over.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)