Select your timezone:
Select

Indiana Pacers - Brooklyn Nets

11/26 01:00 nierkinho +5.20
2016/11/25 20:02 Brooklyn Nets (Nets under 106) @-154 8/10
 

NBA. Pacers (7-9) - Nets (4-10).

Pacers per paskutines 5 varžybas tiek prasileido 3 kartus. Visgi visus 3 kartus prieš greito tempo teams kaip Suns ar Warriors, o prieš Thunder tik po pratęsimo.

Nets yra visiškai kiauri gynyboje, bet patiems dažnai pritrūksta, kad viršytų tokį totalą. Vis dar nežaidžia Lin, o Jefferson yra ant klaustuko.

Pas Pacers dar neaiškus P.George, bet ir žaidžiant be jo, foros gal ir nepadengs, bet bent apsiginti prieš Nets, namai tikrai pajėgūs.

  • Voted: 4
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

nierkinho

Thanks: 444

Followers: 12

  • Units 73.20
  • ROI 0.31%
  • W% 52.31%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 2554
  • Units won: 24549.20
  • W-L-T : 1291-1177-86
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 9.58
  • Staked units: 24476.00
  • Avg. Odds: -101
 

Unit change

9084787266602024 December2025 November

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    (Milwaukee Bucks) @125 7/10
    Hello.
    NBA. Raptors against Bucks. Let's support the Bucks.
    Raptors don't seem like a strong Eastern team. After losing 4 games, they managed to beat the struggling Cavs, who are currently without Morant from the Grizzlies. Bucks, on the other hand, have surprisingly started their season well and look very confident. Poeltl will most likely miss these games, so they will be missing a key player under the basket. On the Bucks' side, Porter Jr. is still out (although he has been out since the first match) and there is a question mark over Giannis. Just because there is a question mark over him and the odds are good, I believe there is a chance he will play. The Bucks already beat the Raptors this season and I think they can do it again if Greek Freak plays. Without him, it will be difficult, but I am willing to take the risk with the odds given. Good luck.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)