Select your timezone:
Select

Hiltzik J. (Usa) - Nakagawa N. (Jpn)

11/30 21:30 Rangas -8.00
2016/11/30 20:28 Hiltzik J. (Usa) (Hiltzik J. win 2-0) @-125 8/10
 

ITF MEN - SINGLES: Waco (USA), hard (indoor).

Hiltzik J. yra (630 ATP),o jo sios dienos varzovas japonas Nakagawa N.(751 ATP).
Iskarto pliusas,kad Hiltzik yra vietinis zaidejas.Jo megstamiausia danga hard ir jis dabar ant sios dangos rodo palyginus gerus rezultatus.Vakar jis 2-0 iveike treciu cia skirstyta Quigley E.Hiltzik praktiskai tik ir losia namu turnyruose ant hardo.

Priesingai nei jo sios dienos varzovas Nakagawa.Jis labiau yra clay zaidejas ir pastaruoju metu zaide vien ant clay.Vakar jis cia per 3 setss isvargo Peru pries 995 rakete Rinderknech.Tad ir jegu iseikvojo nemazai.

Dar dadekim ,kad pries pora metu Hiltzik aplose cia Amerikoje ant hardo lengvai 2-0 savo sios dienos varzova.Visi pliusai siandien cia uz namu zaideja.Gimtos sienos ir megstamiausia danga duos savo rezultata.Laukiu lengvos Peru 2-0.Sekmes!

  • Voted: 2
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly
  • Units 4529.84
  • ROI 12.85%
  • W% 52.36%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 3959
  • Units won: 41123.84
  • W-L-T : 1994-1814-151
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 9.24
  • Staked units: 36594.00
  • Avg. Odds: 126.5
 

Unit change

4540452845164504449244802024 November2025 October

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Peers J./ Zielinski J. @-182 8/10
    ATP China, hard... a completely fresh duo clash between an experienced Australian and a Polish player, already in the first tournament of this caliber, has shown that these two personalities have a great interest here. In the previous round, they clearly dominated the top pair from Italy. Today's opponents, a solid German pair - hardworking fighters, cannot be underestimated, but... the Germans are on a different level. They may aim to win a set, but the final victory will most likely go to the experienced masters.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)