Select your timezone:
Select

Wolverhampton - Manchester City

12/28 21:30 julius -8.00
2009/12/28 21:30 Wolverhampton (1) @340 8/10
 

Manchester City nera pastovi komanda.Ji gali nugaleti chelsea o poto prasileisti tris ivarcius nuo evertono ar net pralaimeti 3-0 totenham.Aisku Totenham stipri komanda bet toks rezultatas tikrai gedingas. Wolverhampton jau yra pateike keleta sensaciju ir manau kad visai gali ir cia mus nustebinti.Beje kai rungtynes vyksta tik po dvieju dienu pertraukos tai zaidejai tikrai nera pilnai pasiilseje ir jie tikrai nezais taip kaip kad zaistu jei rungtynes vyktu po savaites.TAigi cia manau visko gali nutikti

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

julius

Thanks: 10

Followers: 0

  • Units -144.26
  • ROI -2.23%
  • W% 30.12%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 887
  • Units won: 6708.74
  • W-L-T : 253-587-47
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.73
  • Staked units: 6853.00
  • Avg. Odds: 398
 

Unit change

-130-136-142-148-154-1602025 March2026 February

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    (Over 3) @-118 8/10
    Two teams with quite good form and productive football. United with Carrick looks significantly better, but old defensive problems and conceded goals still haunt United. Tottenham has problems with injuries but it's still a very solid team, especially with a good attack and similar defensive issues like United. In London, the teams played 2-2 so now we can expect a similar level of productivity, seeing how these teams play.
    Read less
    Read more
    (Over 3) @-120 7/10
    After the change of Manchester United coach, Carrick emphasizes attacking football. Cunha and Mbwemo play very well in the attack line. Bruno plays in his position and even Šeško is already scoring goals. That's why Manchester United is very dangerous in attack. However, it won't be easy because Tottenham is a dangerous team and plays well away, so I expect goals in this match.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)