Select your timezone:
Select
2018/03/04 15:19 Both teams to score - YES @-125 10/10
 

Mano galva, MC yra favoritas šių rungtynių, bet dėl baigties nesu toks tikras, todėl manau, kad over bus saugus pasirinkimas, papildomai pasiimu ir BTTS. MC tiesiog štampuoja goals, bet manau, kad gali pasikartoti vakarykštis Napoli-Romos variantas, kad Chelsea score 1-2 greitus goals, tada sulįs į gynybą ir gaudys kontratakomis.
Chelsea yra tikrai pajėgi scoreti ir tikrai nežais gynyboje, nes jiems labiau reikalinga Peru, nei MC, jei jie dar nori kovoti dėl TOP 4.

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

Zhemaitis

Thanks: 52

Followers: 1

  • Units -254.21
  • ROI -7.80%
  • W% 42.18%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 364
  • Units won: 3052.79
  • W-L-T : 151-207-6
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 9.09
  • Staked units: 3307.00
  • Avg. Odds: 151.2
 

Unit change

-240-246-252-258-264-2702025 April2026 March

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Burnley - Bournemouth

    martyko 03/14 15:00 in 28 minutes
    (Bournemouth -1.5 Corners) @-111 8/10
    Bournemouth is much stronger in my eyes, even though they don't fight for anything because realistically, they have no chances for higher placed teams to drop enough points for them to have a chance at the top. However, theoretically anything is possible, but when you lose key players and the game deteriorates, they still have sharpness and are not complete pushovers. Burnley at home can put up a fight against their opponents, but it's unlikely they can do much, and their chances for survival in the league seem cloudy. So in my opinion, it's better to bet on a team that prefers to attack and has options for going over and sharpening the blade, therefore I believe there will be many corners for their opponents, as Burnley may try to grab those points but it will require some scrapping and we hope corners will be gathered in favor of their opponents.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)