Select your timezone:
Select
2018/03/11 17:58 Over (Corners 10.5) @-125 8/10
 

Kai nezinau ar verta tiketis goals einu su kampiniais kadangi both teams zaidzia atakuojanti futbola. Napoli zais po 2-4 pries Roma todel gali buti pasitemte gynyboje, Inter turi gera gynyba ir retai kada veliasi i atviras varzaybas... both teams turi gerus puolejus, both naudoja Wingeriu sistema zaisdami 4-3-3 kas savaime aisku priveda prie progu. Inter yra viena is oversiai kampiniu periodanciu komandu lygoje, iki pirmo goal jie atakuos, scoree pirmi laukiu spaudimo is Napoli.

  • Voted: 2
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

Ghost!

Thanks: 264

Followers: 5

  • Units -214.99
  • ROI -1.78%
  • W% 48.80%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 1491
  • Units won: 12165.01
  • W-L-T : 709-744-38
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.30
  • Staked units: 12380.00
  • Avg. Odds: 106.2
 

Unit change

-200-206-212-218-224-2302025 January2025 December

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Bologna FC - Juventus

    Lukas2824 12/14 19:45 42 minutes ago
    (-0 Bologna FC) @110 5/10
    I don't see you as favorites here at all. Recently, the results under Spalletti have improved, but the opponents haven't been at a high level either, just by looking at the current 4 out of 5 matches against Bodo Glimt, Udinese, Cagliari and Pafos. In these matches, the last 3 were played at home. Spalletti will have a lot of work to do with this team to reach their previous heights, and I don't think they are capable of winning a difficult away match like Bologna at the moment. Bologna only lost one match unexpectedly to Cremonese at home, but besides that, they have earned 13 out of 15 points at their own stadium and have even managed to defeat Como and Napoli. By the way, Juventus is a solid away team, with only 2 losses. I would take a handicap of 0 for Bologna, if the odds are even then it's a money back, but in my opinion, the likelihood of a win is quite high.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)