Select your timezone:
Select

Golden State Warriors - Sacramento Kings

03/17 02:30 makafutka +9.17
2018/03/16 19:25 Golden State Warriors (Under 109) @-109 10/10
 

Without Curry GSW had 3 unders in a row and now they are down Durant and Thompson. Without those 3 offensive core players it should be hard to repeat GSW style and to push the tempo. Even with Durant but Curry off the floor GSW has a tempo in the league's bottom 10. Today they are facing Kings team, which were the slowest team for a long time this season (now Grizzlies). They actually played this season h2h without Durant and Curry (Thompson, McCaw was playing) and they only scored 106 points with quite a big number of 3pts (16 made with 43% shooting). All in all GSW are left with bunch of league's average players (except Green - but he's not that big of a threat offensively) and rookies, so the total should be closer to a 100 than a 110

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

makafutka

Thanks: 817

Followers: 7

  • Units 692.23
  • ROI 5.60%
  • W% 54.01%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 1666
  • Units won: 13295.23
  • W-L-T : 882-751-33
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.56
  • Staked units: 12603.00
  • Avg. Odds: 103.2
 

Unit change

7107046986926866802025 March2026 February

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    MIA Heat - CHI Bulls

    mall89 02/01 23:00 in 59 minutes
    (MIA Heat) @-172 8/10
    The Bulls, who have many players out, will play back to back games with the Heat. Yesterday, the Bulls won, but when you hit 20 3-pointers at 50% accuracy, you must expect a similar result, which is now practically impossible. The teams are playing for the third time in a row, but the Heat team looks like a clear favorite. These are the last head-to-head games of the season and the only one the Bulls won was due to an excellent 3-point shooting, so this series between the teams should end 3-1 and it is clear who is the winner here.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)