Select your timezone:
Select

Kyle Edmund - ATP Eastbourne

07/01 12:00 LukasLAL824 -4.00
2018/06/27 21:24 Kyle Edmund (Winner) @225 4/10
 

Going to pick this up now before the odds drop even further. I have no doubt Edmund will win this tournament. He's the favourite now and rightly so. With knocking out Andy Murray and being very competitive with Nick kyrgios in the Queens a week ago, I can't see how any of the participants beats Edmund in this tournament. He'll face Kukushkin in the quarters, he'll win that comfortably. Then either Shapovalov or Zverev, that might be the toughest test because Shapovalov is talented while Zverev is a good player himself, but I'd give Edmund the home crowd edge and he's simply better anyway. In the final it'd be either Norrie Lacko Cecchinato or Millman. It's a very weak side of the bracket which means that if Edmund gets through to the final he'll have a comfortable match. Don't see any of these four beating him. It's his tournament to lose right now. Doubt Edmund drops a set let alone a match until the end of the tournament.

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

LukasLAL824

Thanks: 25

Followers: 2

  • Units -198.73
  • ROI -5.53%
  • W% 48.39%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 682
  • Units won: 3576.27
  • W-L-T : 315-336-31
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 5.54
  • Staked units: 3775.00
  • Avg. Odds: 108.6
 

Unit change

-180-186-192-198-204-2102024 September2025 August

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    (Games Over 22.5) @-120 10/10
    Two very good serving tennis players looked quite impressive in this tournament. Medvedev, after defeating Popyrin, I think should once again surprise and not give up easily. In their only previous meeting, they played three sets, which we can expect here as well. Both serve well but are inconsistent and can easily lose a set, especially on this hard court where a tiebreak is also a very real possibility.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)