Select your timezone:
Select

Colorado Avalanche - San Jose Sharks

01/03 02:30 exxessive +6.96
2019/01/03 01:36 San Jose Sharks @-115 8/10
 

Labai trumpai - pasirinkimas yra prasta Colorado forma: is paskutiniu 10 varzybu wina tik dvi ir labai mazai musama goals: vidutiniskai 2.6 per paskutines 10 varzybu, kas yra labai krites ju rodiklis. Sharks labai jau smarkiai svyruoja savo zaidimu, bet musa nemazai ir ypatingai neblogai zaidzia isvykoje siuo metu is paskutiniu 6 winos 5, o goals per paskutinius 10 macu - vidutiniskai 4. Manyciau Sharks score over, nei Avalanche. Statymas Sharks Peru @1.87.

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

exxessive

Thanks: 9

Followers: 0

  • Units -22.40
  • ROI -5.13%
  • W% 46.43%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 56
  • Units won: 414.60
  • W-L-T : 26-30-0
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.80
  • Staked units: 437.00
  • Avg. Odds: 111
 

Unit change

-10-16-22-28-34-402024 May2025 April

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    (Full Event Under 2.5 San Jose Sharks) @-111 8/10
    Edmonton has some losses in its composition, but managed to overcome Calgary and Vegas. The Sharks are a much more threatening opponent. Moreover, Canada usually plays successfully against them. Although the Oilers cannot boast a good defense, the team tries to earn points by using the resources they have. Without McDavid, they also have to be more careful on their own side of the court, not just rush to attack.
    Read less
    Read more
    (Full Event Under 6.5) @110 8/10
    Edmonton has had some losses, but managed to defeat Calgary and Vegas. "Sharks" - a much more threatening opponent. Especially since Canada usually plays successfully against them.

    Although the "Oilers" cannot boast a good defense, the team strives to earn points using the available resources. Without McDavid, they also have to play more carefully in their own half, not just focus on attacking.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)