The shield has an impressive shape, sometimes I even think that if it were thrown in Monte Carlo, it wouldn't make any mistake. Plus, I would mention that it is resistant and well-equipped mentally in difficult situations. The other one, with the Italian Giustino, usually loses after so many breakouts, but not Viliukas. He often can't sustain longer matches, maybe he's a bit too bulky to keep up with longer games after the tension. A big plus is that, judging from the first match, even if Lithuania is early, they are not capable of winning against Austria.
Our Gaubas and second tournament looks very good, and [player] from Spain is feeling great. Ofner is a good specialist on clay, but this season he doesn't even resemble himself, which is logical since he started the season in the middle of March, so he is far from fully prepared. Lithuania may have lost the last prediction with a negative result, but they have shown character by losing one set and getting a break in the first set. Their mastery is currently better than that of their opponent from Austria, who is still searching for himself after his return and has some problems. It would be difficult to beat him for the second time, but considering the circumstances, Gaubas' good form and a coefficient of over 2.5 in the last match, a u2.3 almost allows the option to choose Gaubas again for Peru.
Comments (0)