Select your timezone:
Select

Andy Roddick - Andrey Golubev

11/04 19:00 vlds65 +4.32
2010/11/04 07:22 bet title Roddick -3.5 (Roddick -3.5) @2.080 4/10
 

Vakar maciau beveik visa Andy maca . Varzovas tikrai buvo stiprus ir daug kas vakar Samo nebutu nugalejes . Siaip tikrai zaide galingai Roddick ir graziai . Golubev per paskutines pora savaiciu neteko matyti vaizdo , bet atrodo , pagal jo rezultatus , kad jau krito jo forma nuo Malaizijos . Fora rizikinga ,-2.5 man butu pats tas . Bet kofas tenkina, rizikuoju 😁 .
Paskutiniame susitikime su Malisse Golubevo pirmas servas buvo tik 52 proc. Issikapste del silpno antro varzovo servo gan nesunkiai ( laimejo 62 proc ) ir 5 Malisse doublefaultu - na cia mazmozis 😁 .
Roddick vakar varzovui pasiule 16 eisu ir 76 proc pirma serva . Tikekimes kad jo statistika nepabloges , o varzovo nepageres .

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

vlds65

Thanks: 0

Followers: 0

  • Units 37.36
  • ROI 0.91%
  • W% 58.11%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 740
  • Units won: 4422.36
  • W-L-T : 405-292-43
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 5.93
  • Staked units: 4385.00
  • Avg. Odds: 1.861
 

Unit change

5044383226202024 January2024 December

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Joao Fonseca - Learner Tien

    False9 12/22 17:00 52 minutes ago
    (Learner Tien) @3.650 7/10
    I believe it has a lot of value. Even though I stood apart from the group when they met in Brazil, watching the American make fun of Fonseca and knowing how easily he can be psychologically vulnerable, I think that coefficient is absurd. Overall, his set is 1.49 which is much better than Brazil's Peru. A slightly higher coefficient is also more reliable. It is definitely possible for Peru, because they always have close matches against each other, and knowing that in tennis it is harder to defeat the same opponent in a short period of time, I see a lot of value.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)