Select your timezone:
Select

Richard Berankis - Filippo Volandri

01/08 00:00 vlds65 +3.50
2011/01/07 21:32 bet title Berankis 2-0 (Berankis 2-0) @1.500 7/10
 


Kaip zaidzia Berankis paskutiniu metu , zinome visi . Turejo kelias dienas poilsio . Nezinau, kas galetu pakisti koja, kad cia nebutu sausos pergales . Volandri geras buvo 2007 metais, kai buvo pakiles iki 25 reitingo vietos , nuo 2003 iki 2008 metu reitinge laikesi tarp 40-50 vietu .
Tikrai patyres, zaides su daugybe rimtu dabartiniu zaideju . Per ilga karjera laimejo 2 celendzerius . Ricardas tiek laimejo pernai per metus ...
Aukstus reitingus visada turejo grunto deka. Viena koja apibegti Ricardui jo gal ir nepavyks , nes neseniai paeme seta is Gabashvili Peterburge ant hardo uzdarose patalpose , o ir ant grunto finalu pernai turejo .
Sekmes visiems 😁 Lauksim ryt dvieju skalpu, cia turetu buti pirmas .

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

vlds65

Thanks: 0

Followers: 0

  • Units 37.36
  • ROI 0.91%
  • W% 58.11%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 740
  • Units won: 4422.36
  • W-L-T : 405-292-43
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 5.93
  • Staked units: 4385.00
  • Avg. Odds: 1.861
 

Unit change

5044383226202024 January2024 December

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Joao Fonseca - Learner Tien

    False9 12/22 17:00 6 minutes ago
    (Learner Tien) @3.650 7/10
    I believe it has a lot of value. Even though I stood apart from the group when they met in Brazil, watching the American make fun of Fonseca and knowing how easily he can be psychologically vulnerable, I think that coefficient is absurd. Overall, his set is 1.49 which is much better than Brazil's Peru. A slightly higher coefficient is also more reliable. It is definitely possible for Peru, because they always have close matches against each other, and knowing that in tennis it is harder to defeat the same opponent in a short period of time, I see a lot of value.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)