Asia Muhammad - Storm Sanders

Such a risky bet. In Rybakina's form, things are heating up here, and Draw no Bets have been almost non-existent since October, but Pegula has a very good head, she makes good use of her opponent's weaknesses, she is very technical, her downside is a weak serve, but if Pegula manages to impose her rhythm on her opponent, then the match becomes 50/50. Pegula has very good endurance, she can withstand multiple matches in a row, and the added bonus is that she knows how to play against Rybakina, with a head-to-head record of 3:2 in favor of Pegula, even though Rybakina won the last match, it's still a small advantage. I remember that even in the 2023 season-ending tournament, Rybakina was favored over Pegula, but Pegula was able to impose her game rhythm and won 7:5; 6:2. At that time, Pegula didn't seem very impressive, but Rybakina's serves started to fail and Pegula took advantage.

In my eyes, it is clear that Rybakina is the favorite here without a doubt, simply looking better and almost without any problems. Overall, Rybakina is a more stable player, has a better serve, and in general, she can handle Pegula anytime. I am convinced.

In the September tournament, Rybakina won 6-4 6-1 without a hassle, of course, this is a different story, but looking at it as a whole, I see only one winner, everything is in Rybakina's favor.

The most logical option for me would be a negative handicap and 2-0, final finishes this year should logically be at the top. What interests me are the small coefficient wins, simple until what duble is suitable.

In my eyes, it is clear that Rybakina is the favorite here without words, she just looks better and is currently facing almost no problems. In general, Rybakina is a more stable player, has a better serve, and overall is better than Pegula. But at any time, Pegula could surprise and I am convinced of that.
In September, Rybakina won 6-4 6-1 without difficulty, of course, it's a different story, but looking at the bigger picture, I see only one winner, everything is on Rybakina's side.

I will take the most logical option, a minus and 2-0, the final finishes this year should be logical. I am interested in small odds, a simple win or maybe even a doubles match.

I don't know, to me Sabalenka seems significantly better than Anisimova. Especially in terms of consistency. Overall, Sabalenka's group looked much stronger, perhaps only Paolini did not perform well, while Gauff was impressively powerful but struggled in her first match, with too many double faults against Pegula. Gauff's serving and movement were superb in the tournament, but Sabalenka was able to break her in the first set and Gauff lost hope in the second. Anisimova has weaker movement than Gauff and is less consistent at the back of the court, often getting flustered by good opposition, resulting in a weaker serve. Realistically, Anisimova didn't bring anything serious to the table, beating Keys (who couldn't play at full strength due to injury) and Swiatek (lacking physicality on hard courts, unable to perform like she does on clay, and her second serve becomes weak like Errani's). Even Swiatek, with her style of play on hard courts, will likely not reach the top 5 in the WTA until next clay season, and she even lost to Rybakina. In that group, Rybakina was the only one who truly stood out, while Sabalenka, Gauff, and Pegula were on a similar level. Sabalenka is better in every aspect, her only main weakness being that after winning the first set, she sometimes lets her guard down in the second.

I don't know, Sabalenka seems much better than Anisimova. Especially in terms of stability. Overall, Sabalenka's group looked much stronger, maybe only Paolini didn't shine, but otherwise Gauff played powerfully, although she had a disappointing first match with Pegula, with too many double faults. Gauff had good serving and movement in the tournament, but Sabalenka managed to break her in the first set and Gauff lost hope in the second set. Anisimova has worse movement than Gauff and less stability at the back of the court, which results in her struggling with her serve when under pressure from the opponent. Realistically, Anisimova didn't show anything serious here, and she also didn't have to face Keys (who had to withdraw due to injury) or Swiatek (lacking physicality on hard court, didn't perform well, and her second serve became like Errani's), and she lost to Rybakina. In that group, only Rybakina really stood out, and that's where Sabalenka, Gauff, and Pegula were. In every aspect, Sabalenka is better here, her only main downfall being that she can lose her focus after winning the first set.