Select your timezone:
Select

Denis Shapavalov - Rafael Nadal

12/18 13:00 betrespect -10.00
2021/12/18 09:04 Rafael Nadal @2.050 10/10
 

In emirates tournament for the 3 place will meet R. Nadal 6 ATP and D. Shapovalov 14 ATP. After injury Nadal came to play against Murray and Murray played magnificent tennis and after a lot of Nadal errors he lost 0-2 to Murray, but we can’t compare Shapovalov to Murray who’s form is best in over 2-3 years. Shapovalov lost 2-1 against Rublev in tough match but today he will face even better opponent and Nadal shouldn’t make that much errors and should easy win against Canadian who although won first meeting between two tennis players then lost 3 in a row and now will be the 4.

  • Voted: 5
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

betrespect

Thanks: 66

Followers: 0

  • Units -86.28
  • ROI -15.11%
  • W% 40.91%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 68
  • Units won: 499.72
  • W-L-T : 27-39-2
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.62
  • Staked units: 586.00
  • Avg. Odds: 2.185
 

Unit change

-70-76-82-88-94-1002024 December2025 November

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    F. Passaro - A. Blockx

    Kentukyo 11/04 12:30 in 50 minutes
    F. Passaro @2.750 8/10
    ATP Metz. France.
    The Belgian Blockx is arriving after a recently won tournament, just two days ago he played in the final and now he's here. Young, inexperienced and the form of such players after winning tournaments tends to decline. In general, the end of the season and the built-up workload throughout the season make it a challenge to play at such a fast pace again. Meanwhile, Passaro has already warmed up in France, playing and confidently winning 2 matches in the qualifiers. I believe Blockx should not be such a clear favorite today, and I would even rate their chances equally, or maybe even more in favor of Passaro due to a packed schedule at the end of the season, where he has had more time to rest.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)