Select your timezone:
Select
2022/03/20 21:22 (Domantas Sabonis Over 20.5 Points) @1.800 5/10
 

Kings be fox . Manau Sabonis turėtų būt lyderis puolime . Sabonis gauna daug minučių žaist . Per prastas 3 runktynes Sabonis įmetė 22 22 30 points . Todėl laukiu Sabonio bent 21 points per runktynes.

  • Voted: 2
 
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

Rolas666

Thanks: 1

Followers: 0

  • Units -2.20
  • ROI -1.54%
  • W% 55.17%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 31
  • Units won: 150.80
  • W-L-T : 16-13-2
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 4.94
  • Staked units: 153.00
  • Avg. Odds: 1.855
 

Unit change

104-2-8-14-202023 June2024 May

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Less statistics Detailed statistics

Related picks (6)

    Minnesota Timberwolves (-3.0) @2.450 8/10
    It is not easy to have a 0-3 result in a series, but you don't want to believe that a team like the Timberwolves will lose so easily. Before this series, the Minnesota team looked good, defeating the Suns and later defeating the NBA champions over 7 games. So far in this series, the Timberwolves have been unluckily losing, but if they continue to fight, they may have a good chance of winning.
    Read less
    Read more
    Over (K.A.Towns 19.5+) @1.800 8/10
    (Mike Conley Over 2.5 Rebounds) @1.606 8/10
    Under (M.Conley -2.5 3PT) @1.580 8/10
    (Ordinary Time Minnesota Timberwolves) @2.150 8/10
    (Ordinary Time Minnesota Timberwolves) @2.150 8/10
    I don't expect both series to end in a sweep, especially since the Mavs were considered underdogs in the first place. Edwards believes in a comeback and stated that there will be a fight, but the main reason why I am going with the Wolves is because all 3 games were close and Lively suffered an injury. He was one of the key players, the rotation between Gafford and Lively was almost perfect, and now Powell, who is very poor, will get more minutes and the team will suffer. Also, I don't expect Luka, with his injuries, to play as perfectly as before.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)