Select your timezone:
Select

D. Goffin - D. Dzumhur

04/06 11:10 menduz +8.00
2022/04/06 03:08 D. Goffin (-3.5 games) @100 8/10
 

Two hard-to-predict tennis players, Goffin and Dzumhur, meet at the Marrakesh tournament on the clay. Clearly better is Goffin, have won the only meeting of these tennis players in 2016 3-1, but both tennis players are certainly not playing their best tennis. I think the best Bosnian racket will definitely try to play hard against the former 7 rocket in the world, but I think Goffin, who plays well in defense, will break Dzumhur more than once. Previously, such odds for a Goffin -3.5 game advantage you would never get when Belgian is playing against a second-hundred player, but over the years and seeing what Belgian form is all that is understandable, Dzumhur Belgian I think will definitely beat and gain that advantage as Belgium starts to show off his old game.

  • Voted: 3
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

menduz

Thanks: 520

Followers: 6

  • Units -1149.97
  • ROI -6.41%
  • W% 47.32%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 2261
  • Units won: 17572.03
  • W-L-T : 1026-1142-93
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.28
  • Staked units: 18722.00
  • Avg. Odds: 107.4
 

Unit change

-1020-1048-1076-1104-1132-11602024 September2025 August

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    (Davidovich Fokina, Alejandro) @-122 10/10
    The Spanish man, who looks very good, continues to amaze with how well he performs on the hard courts of America. Although, as usual, sometimes his concentration fades, but the Peruvian team is defeated. Mensik, being his first tournament, had a tough match against Boyer, but the mistakes made by the Czech man will not be given as gifts to the Spanish man anymore. I truly believe that the Spanish man will win and it's a shame that he is the favorite, but it's not just because the Czech man looks weak, but also because the Spanish man plays very well.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)