The round of 16 was completely underwhelming and out of the 8 games only 3 cards were shown, there was a very fair game even in the six games with the favorites wins and solid cuts and only two were drawn to the end, but there weren't many cards there, and there shouldn't have been. The quarter-finals started much more tensely, the competitors are more equal, so the battles and nerves are over, plus the closer to the final, the more tension in the heads. Thus, in the quarterfinals, Oliver (4 cards) and Lahos (endless cards) were on top during this championship, showing over GK, but teams Croatia Brazil Netherlands Agentina collecting very few points, like England (0 cards) and France (2 cards), in these the Brazilian Sampaio whose WC the average is over 3 (Senegal vs Netherlands 3, Poland vs Saudi Arabia 5 and Netherlands vs USA 2) The English and Wales had 3 cards as well as the French and Danes also 3. All the numbers revolve around 3 and the total, taking the overall trends of this championship, seems to be set well, but won't the English be without a card at such a stage? Can there be fair play between these neighbors? Yes, it may be possible, but it can also be rough, and if it falls, at least one goal will increase the tension. the coefficient is suitable, although O2.5 would be more logical, but I am trying larger ones, for which I would give 50%
- Voted: 3
Comments (0)