Select your timezone:
Select

Southampton - Nottingham Forest

01/04 19:30 tonas -8.00
2023/01/04 17:12 (Southampton) @128 8/10
 

Southampton has the best opportunity to take 3 points and rise from that bottom. Nottingham are new to the league and are struggling. After looking at them, 8 matches are played with 2 points. 1/22 goals ratio. 5-6 conceded from Arsenal and MC, that's understandable, but 4 from Leicester. As the saying goes, it's difficult for Nottingham footballers to play away from home, and I don't think anything will get better for them even today. Because the same Southampton are sitting at the bottom and after today Peru will at least rise from the bottom of the table for a while..

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

tonas

Thanks: 189

Followers: 2

  • Units -419.03
  • ROI -6.19%
  • W% 43.66%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 810
  • Units won: 6605.97
  • W-L-T : 341-440-29
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.67
  • Staked units: 7025.00
  • Avg. Odds: 119
 

Unit change

-400-406-412-418-424-4302025 January2025 December

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Brentford - Leeds

    Lukas2824 12/14 16:30 58 minutes ago
    (Over 2.5) @110 5/10
    I am amazed that we are getting 2 coefficients for 2.5 Over here. First of all, Brentford plays at home and they are a completely different team at home, not only in terms of being ranked 4th in the league, but also scoring 15 goals in 7 games, including 3 against top clubs such as Newcastle, Liverpool, and Manchester United, and 2 against Chelsea. They will be facing Leeds, a team fighting for survival, but now aiming for a high place in the standings after scoring 6 goals against Chelsea and Liverpool last week. They defend poorly in away games and even though we may not score much, I believe our current good offensive play will contribute to the total score. I also think there will be both teams scoring and it will be over.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)