Select your timezone:
Select

Anadolu Efes - Zalgiris Kaunas

09/15 14:30 buwsss +12.16
2024/09/15 13:01 Anadolu Efes (ah-4.5) @152 8/10
 

Both teams are not the strongest yet, but so far Zalgiris does not convince me, plus the coach is using large and wide rotations in search of better options. Peru is doing well, but it seems that for now, it is not a priority for Zalgiris and a good example of this was the end of the match with Tofas. Anadolu seems like a more serious team, even without two potential leaders.

  • Voted: 4
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

buwsss

Thanks: 10

Followers: 1

  • Units -323.10
  • ROI -4.85%
  • W% 45.59%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 791
  • Units won: 6409.90
  • W-L-T : 357-426-8
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.51
  • Staked units: 6733.00
  • Avg. Odds: 117.1
 

Unit change

-20-86-152-218-284-3502024 September2025 August

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    Lithuania - Turkey

    faster 08/20 16:30 in 35 minutes
    Turkey (over 78.5) @-132 8/10
    Lithuania is a team known for its offensive strength rather than its defense. They were able to successfully stop Slovenia, who without Doncic are only average, but now they face Turkey, who can put up a good fight. Although Lithuania easily defeated Turkey 91-71, Sengunas played for only 7 minutes and Larkin was not registered. Sengunas is like the Jokic of Turkey, involved in all their attacks and creativity. It will be difficult for Lithuania's defense to stop their opponents for a second time.
    Read less
    Read more

    Lithuania - Turkey

    Giowaniz 08/20 16:30 in 35 minutes
    (Turkey) @175 6/10
    I am a non-popular person. Everything is going smoothly like butter. My plans are being carried out, the game is beautiful, and the psychology is good. On top of all this, I am trying to build something here. Everything seems too good and it could become monotonous (which would be very beneficial, I think).
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)