Select your timezone:
Select

Golden State Warriors - Oklahoma City Thunder

11/28 03:10 eimanteloo +6.80
2024/11/27 22:37 (-3.5 Oklahoma City Thunder) @1.850 8/10
 

Two rival teams from the Western Conference meet. I give the advantage to the OKC team, who have demonstrated a fantastic defense this season. The Warriors' star player Curry will not play today, and his replacement, bench player Poole, will not be able to keep up with SGA's level. It is also uncertain if Kuminga, an important player who rises from the bench, will play. Without him, I can't imagine how the Warriors will score points against an elite defense.

  • Voted: 1
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

eimanteloo

Thanks: 8

Followers: 0

  • Units -70.23
  • ROI -4.74%
  • W% 50.00%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 182
  • Units won: 1440.77
  • W-L-T : 89-89-4
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.30
  • Staked units: 1511.00
  • Avg. Odds: 1.941
 

Unit change

-40-54-68-82-96-1102025 February2026 January

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    LA Lakers - ATL Hawks

    Lukas2824 01/14 03:30 in 53 minutes
    (-3 ATL Hawks) @1.880 6/10
    Lakers Back to Back, tonight Luka on the sideline might also play because of LeBron, it's not clear even though there was no report. But this season they haven't played any 2 game back-to-back situations yet and of course they are facing the Hawks team without Trae Young, who looks good this season and especially plays solidly on the road with a record of 13-10. I think the Hawks are just not a match for the Lakers, being a young, athletic and fast-paced team, these are all advantages that I consider in this match. The Lakers are not athletic nor good at defending in transition, and if Luka doesn't play, they won't have much to offer on the court. I highly doubt if we will even see LeBron on the court. I think a blowout is a very possible scenario, so I'm taking the simple Hawks handicap.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)