Select your timezone:
Select

Rebecca Marino - Katie Boulter

01/14 00:00 Savage
2025/01/13 19:39 (Sets -1.5 Katie Boulter) @-175 8/10
 

Boulter is in much better form here than Marino. She puts up a fight, even against opponents like Swiatek, and has won both previous meetings 0-2 confidently. This is my easy win.

  • Voted: 5
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

Savage

Thanks: 1

Followers: 0

  • Units -8.64
  • ROI -13.50%
  • W% 50.00%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 9
  • Units won: 63.36
  • W-L-T : 4-4-1
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.00
  • Staked units: 72.00
  • Avg. Odds: -125
 

Unit change

104-2-8-14-202025 March2026 February

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Less statistics Detailed statistics

Related picks (2)

    (Novak Djokovic) @250 7/10
    If Djokovic reaches the final of the Australian Open, he will win.
    And there have been 10 such finals.
    Last year, Alcaraz had no chances in the QF against Djokovic.
    In terms of rest, Djokovic has a clear advantage.
    And I believe that history will repeat itself, as it often happens when a player is already packing their bags to go home, but something from above happens and they become the champion.
    It's not the first time this has happened. Most recently, Sinner experienced it.
    For me, this coefficient, considering all the nuances, is like candy.
    Read less
    Read more
    (Novak Djokovic) @245 1/10
    The defeated Sinner shows that Djokovic arrived here to win. Alcaraz has problems with muscles and their spasms, and it is very likely that we will see something similar against Djokovic. The Serb, with his immense experience, is able to change his game and tactics and knows how to bypass the rules. Last year, Djokovic already defeated the Spaniard 3-1, and in the final, the Serbian realistically does not lose, and at the Australian Open he currently has a 10-0 record in terms of won finals. Of course, I was hoping for a higher coefficient, but this one also looks attractive.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)