Select your timezone:
Select
2025/03/11 21:14 Messitas (-5.5 2nd map) @175 10/10
 

BB is the weakest team in history on which one could wager for over 10 years of playing CS. It consists of 3-4 level players and one decent AWPer who can hit headshots. Despite having all 10+ and plenty of experience, they struggle against other teams. However, as a team, they are considerably stronger and even more so in terms of skill. Against all odds, BB barely manages to win 1-2 rounds in the league. Even if they were to have both pistols, they would still lose and possibly go -9.5. This is a guaranteed free bet.

  • Voted: 1
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

rekklesmygod

Thanks: 2

Followers: 0

  • Units 12.91
  • ROI 4.82%
  • W% 48.48%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 34
  • Units won: 290.91
  • W-L-T : 16-17-1
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.18
  • Staked units: 278.00
  • Avg. Odds: 129.1
 

Unit change

3022146-2-102024 April2025 March

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Vitality - Liquid

    iChew 03/14 14:45 10 minutes ago
    Vitality (2:0) @-112 8/10
    In my opinion, Vitality is currently the better team and I will stick with them until the end - both potentially in the semifinals against NaVi and potentially in the final against Spirit. Liquid made it to the playoffs, but their game does not inspire confidence. The match against 3DMAX was not easy, and we can also remember their losses against MOUZ, Falcons, and Spirit. There are not many maps where Liquid would have the advantage - perhaps Anubis, which Vitality does not particularly like but still plays well. Ancient is banned by Vitality, which is one of Liquid's better maps. That leaves Inferno, Nuke, and Dust2 - everywhere Vitality looks strong. Even if Liquid tries their luck with Train, Vitality has won all three times so far. I am not expecting any surprises, I believe that Vitality will take the series 2-0.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)