Select your timezone:
Select

LA Lakers - DEN Nuggets

03/20 02:00 mall89 -8.00
2025/03/19 21:10 (DEN Nuggets) @-132 8/10
 

Many write that Jokic and Murray should play, while James and the Lakers won't have the usual advantage. Although Denver recently barely won at home against the Lakers without James and Doncic, they are still strong favorites and can realistically beat the Lakers at any time.

  • Voted: 2
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

mall89

Thanks: 684

Followers: 8

  • Units -652.71
  • ROI -2.64%
  • W% 50.58%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 3121
  • Units won: 24360.29
  • W-L-T : 1561-1525-35
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.01
  • Staked units: 25013.00
  • Avg. Odds: -104
 

Unit change

-620-652-684-716-748-7802025 May2026 April

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    Boston Celtics - Toronto Raptors

    Kentukyo 04/05 19:35 56 minutes ago
    (Sandro Mamukelashvili Over 9.5 Points) @-118 8/10
    Sandro is taking on an increasingly important role in the NBA, scoring a total of 7 games in a row. His average for the season is 11 points, but there were games where he only played about 10 minutes. Lately, his playing time has been increasing, with back-to-back games and the first blowout being played with fewer minutes. Today's game against Toronto is crucial because they could still make it to the playoffs, but their schedule is not the easiest, so they will try to hold on today and should play over.
    Read less
    Read more
    (MEM Grizzlies) @210 6/10
    Both teams are playing with completely random players, collecting losses one after another. There is no point in looking at the team compositions or anything else, because they could win regardless, it's a completely 50/50 match I think, and a 3+ coefficient is suitable for betting and winning, especially as the season is coming to an end and both teams don't need anything anymore, but someone will still take the victory.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)