Select your timezone:
Select
2025/03/26 17:12 Djokovic (1:2 Djokovic) @270 7/10
 

The night version, which is quite attractive. Djokovic may have confidently defeated the Italian, showing a period of excellence, but there Musetti tragically appeared, although he created a period of beautiful episodes between them, but everything that can be said, it seems that there is a bit of possibility for Peru after such an easy win. Korda at home can certainly offer a fight and he proved that by defeating Monfils, although it shouldn't be exaggerated, as it is obvious that the Frenchman's battery ran out, but Korda can easily stretch the game to tie-breaks on a good day, where the chances often end up 50/50. Nadal, of course, surpasses him in skill, mentality and other aspects, but he is not the same robot as he was in previous years, age is starting to show and even the experienced tennis players can sense his blood and yearn for a more extended game. All in all, in good circumstances, I believe Korda is capable of taking a set, but other aspects are on Nadal's side, which will determine his victory. We will see how it goes, but it will definitely be interesting to see if Musetti accidentally took him out of the game.

  • Voted: 6
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

martyko

Thanks: 251

Followers: 12

  • Units -564.86
  • ROI -2.47%
  • W% 40.66%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 2683
  • Units won: 22725.14
  • W-L-T : 1069-1560-54
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.68
  • Staked units: 23290.00
  • Avg. Odds: 163
 

Unit change

-190-284-378-472-566-6602025 April2026 March

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    (Games -3.5 Stefanos Tsitsipas) @-120 8/10
    No matter how poorly the Greek plays this season, it is necessary to defeat opponents of this level. Although the Greek's form is bad, when the time comes to play against players from the top 100, he does not falter, so I hope for the same in this match.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)