Select your timezone:
Select

Indiana Pacers - New York Knicks

06/01 00:05 martyko -8.00
2025/05/31 23:33 (1st half -5.5 Indiana Pacers) @150 8/10
 

Although the Knicks are not worse on paper, Indiana looks better and I would risk with both the over and the negative handicap, as Indiana has already proven their advantage over the Knicks. Haliburton is a crucial player for Indiana and they need him to have a good game, as the whole game revolves around him and if the Knicks don't shut him down, they won't have much chance. As for the over in general, I believe that in such a situation, there will be a lot of scoring if Indiana manages to create a lead early on, and with the high pace of these teams, there is a good chance of that happening.

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

martyko

Thanks: 249

Followers: 12

  • Units -585.28
  • ROI -2.62%
  • W% 40.57%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 2619
  • Units won: 22206.72
  • W-L-T : 1041-1525-53
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.70
  • Staked units: 22792.00
  • Avg. Odds: 163.2
 

Unit change

-40-152-264-376-488-6002025 February2026 January

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    Houston Rockets (Over 118.5 pts) @-111 6/10
    I will take Rockets over tonight. Lately, the team hasn't been looking good, but they had to compete against Sengun, Suns, and Blazers, two teams that are much stronger than today's opponent. To stop the bleeding, Rockets must win tonight because they have the potential to make it to the Playoffs. Rockets have one of the best offensive ratings in the league, they just struggle with their pace, but the Kings team is just pathetic, they have no defense and in their current 7-game losing streak, they have allowed 120+ points 5 times. It's not yet 100% clear about Sengun's availability tonight, but even without him, I believe Rockets will easily defeat the Kings.
    Read less
    Read more
    Over (D.DeRozan 6.5+ reb+ast) @-132 7/10

Comments (0)