Select your timezone:
Select

Nuno Borges - Ugo Humbert

06/13 09:00 martyko +8.00
2025/06/13 06:54 (Sets -1.5 Ugo Humbert) @100 8/10
 

This is probably one of the best choices in my mind for today. Humbert is much stronger and more impressive on the grass, although this season hasn't been the best for him, but knowing his serves and ability to work on returns, Borges shouldn't be able to resist in the long run. Borges mainly relies on his serve, but I believe in crucial moments he should gain the advantage, so I confidently choose the Frenchman Peru.

  • Voted: 2
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

martyko

Thanks: 249

Followers: 12

  • Units -593.68
  • ROI -2.64%
  • W% 40.59%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 2636
  • Units won: 22332.32
  • W-L-T : 1048-1534-54
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.70
  • Staked units: 22926.00
  • Avg. Odds: 163.1
 

Unit change

-100-202-304-406-508-6102025 March2026 February

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    (Games Over 18.5) @-125 6/10
    I believe that after the Australian Open win, it's been only 2 weeks, Alcaraz might have a memorable hangover. And here, with a server bot, he immediately has to face someone who he played against 4 times before, and I wouldn't say that at least one of those times he didn't completely destroy the Frenchman. The closest was at the US Open where he won 7-6 6-3 6-4 last year, and I had the chance to watch that match and Alcaraz was in his peak form and could cover any set combination with an Over. It is possible to try under 19.5 with a higher coefficient, but I will stick with 18.5, so that there wouldn't be two overs in any set. Even though Carlos is known for that, I think it will be extremely difficult against the Frenchman's serve. It should be a 6-3, 6-4, but I wouldn't be surprised if he could drag at least one set up to a tiebreak. By the way, all 4 times they've played, at least one set went over 7 winning games.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)