Select your timezone:
Select

Chicago Bulls - Sacramento Kings

10/30 00:00 martyko -8.00
2025/10/29 09:36 (-1.5 Sacramento Kings) @185 8/10
 

I think the coefficient for the Kings is somewhat higher than that of the Bulls. Even though I have placed my bets on the Bulls multiple times this season, as they are truly an enjoyable team to watch, the Kings' game is improving and there is still room for improvement in terms of teamwork. The absence of Sabonis, who used to contribute a lot in the past, is noticeable. However, It is known that there are situations where even with strong individual skills, the game is more influenced by the other players in the team, which seems to be the case with Sabonis. Still, the team has a lot of potential and I believe that individualist players can surprise the Kings in separate games. Therefore, I will take the risk and hope that the Kings can defeat the Bulls in a good match.

  • Voted: 2
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

martyko

Thanks: 249

Followers: 12

  • Units -579.68
  • ROI -2.59%
  • W% 40.60%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 2622
  • Units won: 22236.32
  • W-L-T : 1043-1526-53
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.70
  • Staked units: 22816.00
  • Avg. Odds: 163.1
 

Unit change

-100-200-300-400-500-6002025 March2026 February

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    MIA Heat - CHI Bulls

    mall89 02/01 23:00 in 59 minutes
    (MIA Heat) @-172 8/10
    The Bulls, who have many players out, will play back to back games with the Heat. Yesterday, the Bulls won, but when you hit 20 3-pointers at 50% accuracy, you must expect a similar result, which is now practically impossible. The teams are playing for the third time in a row, but the Heat team looks like a clear favorite. These are the last head-to-head games of the season and the only one the Bulls won was due to an excellent 3-point shooting, so this series between the teams should end 3-1 and it is clear who is the winner here.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)