Select your timezone:
Select
2026/02/04 08:24 Tundra (-7.5 map1) @-114 8/10
 

A better team with more reliable players and better games. Mouz in general still surprises me, somehow they are able to show some results in group stages, but then usually collapse. Of course, their players are not the most stable, but for some time now their results have been quite good. Overall, I think the tundra side has more pros, so I don't think this handicap seems too big.

  • Voted: 0
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

OroBalionas

Thanks: 1529

Followers: 14

  • Units -48.57
  • ROI -0.07%
  • W% 50.90%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 8574
  • Units won: 68354.43
  • W-L-T : 4284-4132-158
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.98
  • Staked units: 68403.00
  • Avg. Odds: 100.5
 

Unit change

250168864-78-1602025 April2026 March

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Nigma Galaxy - Virtus.Pro

    OroBalionas 03/22 20:35 9 minutes ago
    Nigma Galaxy (Map1) @111 8/10
    The biggest downside is that it's BO2, and there are usually a lot of pointless results. Overall, VP has a lot of unreliable players who make mistakes during the game and end up losing matches. Nigma is a somewhat similar team, but I think with this lineup, they seem more reliable. Nigma looks like a more trustworthy team and I believe they will win on the first map.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)