Select your timezone:
Select
2012/04/29 11:30 Ferrer (+4,5 geimo) @140 8/10
 

Bukai turbut rezultatus paziureje Ferrero, sugalvojo toki kofa duot uz labai nemaza fora. Nesvarbu, kad Davidas tik po tiebreiku palauze savo varzovus. O esme tame, kad varzovai buvo is tu, kurie turi viena geriausiu padavimu, po kuriu praktiskai neimanoma kabintis i tasko ispildyma po ilgesniu pasimusinejimu, todel nieko nuostabaus, kad tokie rezultatai. Nadalis favoritas be kalbu, bet kad Ferreras uzmegs rimta kova, labai realu. Draskos vyrukas iki paskutiniuju, o ir is Nadalio puses pareina kvailu klaidu karts nuo karto, kiek stebejau macus jo. Abu vieni geriausiu claycourteriu pasauly, todel galima tiketis rimtos kovos. Vienintelis dalykas,kuris gali pakist koja, tai Ferrero nuovargis, suzaidus tokius rimtus macus, kadangi pats ne jaunuolis jau. Kas megsta mazesne rizika, yra ir +6,5 fora, tik kofai nekokie.

  • Voted: 46
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

povas

Thanks: 1

Followers: 0

  • Units 19.87
  • ROI 0.62%
  • W% 51.26%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 418
  • Units won: 3410.87
  • W-L-T : 204-194-20
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.11
  • Staked units: 3391.00
  • Avg. Odds: 100.2
 

Unit change

30241812602024 May2025 April

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    Goffin - Navone

    martyko 04/17 09:00 9 minutes ago
    Over (2.5 set) @150 8/10
    Goffin is a bit underrated in this pair, of course. He is not the best on clay to this day, but he hasn't been playing better tennis lately and is struggling. Goffin, after a serious injury in the past, is still trying to return to the elite and at times he looks really good. I watched his match in Monte Carlo and he was quite calm even in tough moments, which makes him strong in this pair. However, in the long run, Navone still has an advantage overall and the question is how many ups and downs he will have in this competition. Good luck and well played.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)