Select your timezone:
Select
2012/12/28 22:54 Over (4,5 golo) @500 10/10
 

Nu manau Man City sis macas labai labai svarbus ir jei isvaziuos be pergales tai tikrai jau geda turetu buti . Komanda turi tikrai puikiu zaideju galinciu imusti tik paskutiniu metu kazkaip pastrigo ir tiek ir manau jog kazkada jau turi issaut . Siandien varzovas tikrai tam palankus . Norwich per paskutines 10 rungtyniu muse 8 ir isvis ikale 13 ivarciu . Namuose stipriai kandziojas , nugalejo ir Man United taip kad nebus lengva ir Man City cia . Na tiesiog laukiu is Man City ziauriai atviro futbolo , Norwich ner ka prarast taip kad turetumem isvyst daug golu.

  • Voted: 60
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

julius

Thanks: 10

Followers: 0

  • Units -144.26
  • ROI -2.23%
  • W% 30.12%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 887
  • Units won: 6708.74
  • W-L-T : 253-587-47
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 7.73
  • Staked units: 6853.00
  • Avg. Odds: 398
 

Unit change

-130-136-142-148-154-1602025 March2026 February

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (2)

    (Over 3) @-118 8/10
    Two teams with quite good form and productive football. United with Carrick looks significantly better, but old defensive problems and conceded goals still haunt United. Tottenham has problems with injuries but it's still a very solid team, especially with a good attack and similar defensive issues like United. In London, the teams played 2-2 so now we can expect a similar level of productivity, seeing how these teams play.
    Read less
    Read more
    (Over 3) @-120 7/10
    After the change of Manchester United coach, Carrick emphasizes attacking football. Cunha and Mbwemo play very well in the attack line. Bruno plays in his position and even Šeško is already scoring goals. That's why Manchester United is very dangerous in attack. However, it won't be easy because Tottenham is a dangerous team and plays well away, so I expect goals in this match.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)