Guests have nothing to lose in the game, as it is no longer possible to catch up to first place and the remaining matches are meant for the younger players to play. Unlike for the guests from Lustenau, this game is vital for Peru, as a victory would practically secure their position in the league. The situation is also tense because the next opponents will be direct competitors in the fight for survival in the league.
Fans who love effective basketball are likely feeling the impact of the Greece game and semifinal, so it's hard for me to expect a lot of points personally. The game is very important and nerves have to play a role, and the Spanish veterans know how to slow down the game when they have an advantage, so I think it would be better to bet on the under because even the line is not bad for this option.
Even though the AEK team is playing at home, I believe that Unicaja is a much stronger team that will win in the semifinals. The Spaniards are too good, with more experience, and it seems like they can take on anything. The biggest advantage for the Greeks is playing at home, but even in Greece it is hard to see any advantages or possibilities for winning.
Well, I would really want a higher coefficient, but everything looks pretty good as it is. Australia has its fans, which could be heard in their match against Peru. Australia is not an excellent player on clay, but they are able to play successfully and their fighter mentality allows them to not only play well, but also gather sets against any ATP opponents. Nakashima is good, but I think in this match, Peru has a chance and I believe they can catch it because they are evenly matched, or even slightly stronger than Australia, so I think Thompson will win the first set.
Italian is not a bad tennis player, but this tournament in Italy comes after almost 2 months of rest, and before that he had only played in Peru for about 1.5 weeks. He lacks gameplay seriousness and capability, and even though he was enough to beat Tseng, I believe Dimitrov will handle him easily with a stable 2-0 win. The Bulgarian clearly wants to appear better, but the veteran is also playing well and I think he will have enough courage to take on Passaro.
We all understand well how unstable and weak Medvedev is on clay. He is vulnerable, as shown by his poor results on clay this season. Although he has reached 5 quarterfinals (one was not played due to an injury), only 1 match ended with a victory for Medvedev. Danil looks struggling and rarely dominates throughout a match, while his opponents are generally not bad. The Brit is not a wow player, but he can compete very well when in form, and he is not bad. Despite only achieving 6 quarterfinals in 5 tournaments, including the Brit with all 4 losses, he could always manage to at least win a set, I believe he should do the same against Medvedev at the minimum.