David_1
846
2013/04/02 09:13
#303456
Manne wrote:
THE caretaker Punjab government has decided to reduce tax on entertainment activities and in this regard a summary of Punjab Entertainment Duty Amendment Ordinance-2013 has been sent to Punjab Governor for his approval.
According to sources, the provincial cabinet in its last meeting had approved to reduce entertainment duty on fashion, musical and circus shows, and excluded education and welfare institutions from the entertainment duty net.
After the dissolution of assemblies, it has been decided to implement the ordinance in this regard. In the summary, it has been proposed to reduce
entertainment duty from 65 percent to 20 on fashion, musical shows and from 20 percent to 15 percent on circus shows.
The education and welfare institutions would be excluded from the entertainment duty net; however, these institutions would have to fulfill the condition of Section-VIII of Entertainment Duty Act.
The proposal of Excise & Taxation Department regarding imposing entertainment duty on cinema and chairlift has not been accommodated.
Join:
2008/12/18
Messages:
846
Questions are cropping up in relation to Aussie Senator Richard di Natale’s warning for Apple to exclude PokerStars online casino app from its App Store. It seems the senator is barking up the wrong tree here, because the App Store is only the app vendor, while PokerStars is the online gambling operator.
Besides, thousands have already downloaded and installed the free Apple casino app; who is going to stop Aussie iOS device users from directly connecting to PokerStars’ servers? Well, since the good Senator is only calling on Apple, it means Australian Android users can still download the PokerStars app, although it is not available on Google Play.
What about PokerStars? Will the online casino operator voluntarily block all Australian iOS device users to prevent them from connecting to PokerStars’ software, or will it gamble and wait for a full investigation to take place? Quite many know about PokerStars’ current feud with the American Gaming Association (AGA), and they would be interested to read or hear what AGA has to say about this.
PokerStars is definitely treading on shaky grounds in Australia and in the U.S. since the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (NJDGE) has been taking a tough stance as a regulatory body. PokerStars has yet to have its online gaming licensed approved by the NJDGE. If the ACT Gaming and Racing Commission finds PokerStars guilty of violating the Australian Interactive Gambling Act, the UK-based online gambling operator will fit the “bad actor” description to a tee.
Aussie Senator Wants Apple to Take Down Online Casino Apps : ADI News