Select your timezone:
Select

Poker forum archive

Reply
Subscribe
Skrill and Neteller should now be able to work with licensed Polish online gambling companies.

The Polish Gambling Act was amended last October to expand the range of financial service operators permitted to process gambling transactions, and the new amendments have now come into force.

At present the change will affect the legally-licensed sports betting and horse race betting sites. They will now be able to offer their customers cashier options from payment processors such as Skrill and Neteller.

The main act was passed in 2011, and is highly restrictive—it does not permit licensed online poker. Infringement proceedings have been initiated against Poland by the EU, of which it is a member state, and the October amendment was partially a response to EU Commission concerns.

Prior to the amendment, online gambling transactions were effectively limited to Polish banks and financial providers. With the amendment’s introduction, other EU licensed firms can now offer services.

Last November, the Polish government submitted proposed amendments to the law that would allow a wider product offering for internet gambling, but still exclude online poker. Provision would be by a state licensed monopoly.

Despite the probability of complaints from other countries about these proposals, the EU Commission is unlikely to intervene too forcefully. It has allowed other gambling monopolies, even if only provisionally, such as that in Greece.

The prospects for nationally licensed online poker remain slim. However, there are few measures in place to combat the “gray” market, and players have little difficulty accessing online poker rooms, or depositing and withdrawing their funds from them.



Poland Opens Up to Payment Processors, But Poker Remains a Gray Area | Pokerfuse Online Poker News
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
Merge Gaming poker room PokerHost will reportedly be leaving the network and joining the Equity Poker Network (EPN) within the next couple of weeks.

US-facing affiliate site Professional Rakeback, which broke the news, estimates that Merge Gaming may lose 10% to 20% of its traffic as the result of the departure of PokerHost.

Ever since Merge adopted the Jazette cashier in November 2012, PokerHost has been marginalized within the network. PokerHost continued with its own cashier, but adopted Merge’s new VIP system later than the primary skins Carbon and Aced Poker.

PokerHost players were also recently excluded from the pools for the MTT schedule on Merge and were not able to participate in the recent Carbon Online Poker Series, making PokerHost’s MTT offering very weak.

The Equity Poker Network only launched in September last year. It retains access for US players, and operates as a cooperative where profits are shared between skins. A “shark tax” penalizes skins which bring too many players who win money from players on the other skins—an incentive to skins to recruit a balanced player pool.

The network has grown steadily and now boasts six poker rooms which manage an average of around 150 cash game players at the tables. Founder Clive Archer has just announced that the network has bought the Action Poker brand where Archer used to be CEO.

The likelihood is that there will be a change in the site rankings as EPN gains traffic and Merge loses. EPN is currently in fifth position, Merge is in third, sandwiching the Chico Poker Network.

Depending on how traffic shifts, Chico could emerge in third ahead of both Merge and EPN.

Players should be able to continue with PokerHost even if they have another account on a different EPN skin. The PokerHost cashier, with its segregated accounts will move with the poker room. At the moment, there is no information on how the transfer of VIP points and statuses will be managed.



PokerHost Leaves Merge for the Equity Poker Network | Pokerfuse Online Poker News
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
Even though I work in poker, my life has weirdly taken me to live in different places where playing online wasn’t really an option. Finally, I’m looking to play in my first day back in the USA in the New Jersey Championship of Online Poker (NJCOP) and ohhhh yes, I’m pretty stoked about it!

April 23rd marks my return to the online felt and I’m happy but also a wee bit nervous. To say that I’m rusty would be an understatement. I’ve always felt that my game suffered when I wasn’t able to play online, as for me, that’s always been a place to figure things out, try new ways of playing and test myself. I spent a lot of nights happily tapping away at the bet/raise/fold buttons when I lived in England and I’ve missed it.

$100K Guaranteed Again? You Bet!
786 players had a go back in February. It's showtime again. Registration is open!

Stamina...
One thing I lack from the ‘old days’ is stamina. The late hours aren’t so easy for me and I’ll be blasting my grinding tunes to help me stay focused. I could definitely use some advice from all you regular grinders out there. I’m expecting that I’ll be making some pretty amateur mistakes for the online felt so what do you think I definitely need to remember? You can tweet @karaOTR or answer in the comments below. Please, pretty please.

Montreal Is Calling My Name...
For those of you who’ve been online winning seats to the Montreal WPTN Spring Poker Championship, I’ll be seeing you there as well so you can come and say hi at the Playground. I’m going to be in the running for a big piece of the $1,000,000 guaranteed prize pool along with big names like WPT legend Mike Sexton and many Premier League 7 stars.

I just hope that I’m not at Jeff’s table because not only is he a great player, but Playground Poker Club has some pretty lucky vibes for him and those of you who have seen the early episodes of the partypoker Premier League 7 will know what I’m talking about!

Until next time - Kara Scott

27,000,000th Hand Coming Late Thursday?
We just passed hand # 26,910,000! Time flies when you're having fun at partypoker and the prizes will be flying high as we head towards the 30,000,000th hand played online at NJ-partypoker-com. To celebrate partypoker has set the stakes to give away more than $40,000 to lucky players across the Garden State.

Last Saturday morning we had our 26,000,000th hand winner who got a $1,000 bonus. partypoker will continue counting down five million hands to that epic 30,000,000th deal. Along the way the winner of each milestone hand (26-29 million) bags $1,000 while everyone else at the table gets $100 each. The winner of the 30,000,000th hand gets $10,000 with everyone else at the table getting $1,000.





Poker pro nervous about returning to online felt. Can you help? | NJ-com
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
The Poker Players Alliance (PPA), the leading poker grassroots advocacy group with more than one million members nationwide, today condemns legislation introduced by Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) that seeks to amend the Wire Act of 1961 expanding it to ban Internet poker and select forms of Internet gambling.

“These bills trample on the rights of states, but of greater concern is the fact that they will deny consumers of any meaningful protections that can only be achieved through responsible state or federal regulation. Today, three states are safely and effectively regulating Internet poker. This misguided attempt at prohibition will turn back the clock in those states and destroy the opportunity for others to gain the economic and societal benefits of offering its citizens a safe and regulated place to play online,” said John Pappas, executive director of the PPA. “We hope Senator Graham and Congressman Chaffetz and the other supporters of these bills will sideline any political motivations and choose to support what’s in the best interest of American consumers by reconsidering these bills.”

In 2011 the U.S. Department of Justice, after careful review of relevant case law and legislative history, found that the Wire Act bans only online sports betting. The legislation introduced today would overturn this ruling and grossly expand the scope and intent of the 1961 law. It would also shutter the regulated online gaming markets established in Nevada, New Jersey and Delaware which currently provide hundreds of thousands of online players with effective consumer protections.

PPA members have sent tens of thousands of letters, emails and tweets to their elected members of Congress urging them to support legislation to facilitate licensing and regulation of Internet poker in participating states and to oppose legislation that would expand the Wire Act and strip states of their rights to authorize online poker sites.

“For years, the PPA has fought to provide players with a safe and regulated environment to play poker online across the nation. These bills amount to a prohibition, plain and simple, and they deny the realities of today’s online world. If enacted, they would only serve to expand an unregulated market that protects no one. Instead, Congress should focus on corralling the unregulated marketplace and turning it into a system that is safe for consumers and accountable to regulators and our government,” said Pappas. “Online poker licensing and regulation is the only way to ensure consumers are protected with clear laws and strong enforcements, and poker players deserve this right.”




PPA criticizes proposed bills to ban online poker
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
Multiple individuals in the United States are reporting problems with accessing Bovada – not simply the website, but the platform itself.

A common thread among those experiencing the issue appears to be that they utilize Comcast for their Internet service.

Several players confirm the issue is Comcast-specific (although not necessarily limited to Comcast) in this growing thread on TwoPlusTwo.

Bovada has acknowledged the issue but had offered little in the way of details as of this article:

(We don't know the full extent of the issue and are doing our best to identify a resolution. We'lll keep you updated as we know more. (2/2)



Comcast Users Report Having Problems Accessing Bovada
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
According to the latest Scouting Report figures, global online poker has continued its downward trajectory in 2014 and last week ending 22nd March recorded a 3% fall in traffic compared to the previous week. Relative to the same week last year, however, global online traffic was down by a substantial 14%. Twelve weeks into this year, and cash game player traffic has now declined for nine out of the last 10 weeks.

The situation doesn’t seem to be any better in the nascent US online poker industry, either, with the country’s three regulated markets of New Jersey, Nevada and Delaware all showing a slow but steady decline. One explanation offered has been the clement weather, with PokerScout noting “Spring has sprung, and unfortunately that means traffic is heading lower. Activity levels should decline slowly until early-mid April, at which point a steep descent begins.”

The latest worrying figures brings to mind the prophetic words uttered by 2005 WSOP Main Event winner Joe Hachem, who recently surprised the poker community by declaring “I think poker is dying and it’s dying because it’s no longer fun for people to play.”

With regard to online poker, the Aussie’ words seem to be ringing true, leading numerous analysts to come up with possible solutions to remedy the situation and draw more players back into the game. An article posted by Steve Ruddock provides an interesting perspective on the current situation, with the poker author suggesting that in order for another Poker Boom to occur middle-aged players, who were once the backbone of the game, need to once more drive the poker economy.

The younger crowd have been apportioned blame for decimating the old guard, who used to play for fun before the new breed of savants moved in. According to Ruddock “the prey [middle-aged players] was suddenly very aware they were prey, and because of this a lot of them lost interest.”

Ruddock subsequently concludes the following: “Poker as a pastime or as an enjoyable way to spend an evening seems to be dead (at least in the minds of this crowd), but a second Poker Boom, with an emphasis on bringing middle-aged people with disposable incomes back into the folds could give us the best of both worlds.”



Global Online Traffic Declines 9 Out Of The Last 10 Weeks
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
Chris Moneymaker knows the type. The player whose eyes widen when the 2003 World Series of Poker champion brings his chips over to a table.

"There's always one guy that, right when I sit down, he perks up and says, "I'm going to bust his [rear end]," Moneymaker says.

If that sounds appealing, you have your chance to do just that this weekend in Charles Town, W.Va., where Moneymaker will be playing in a handful events, including Saturday’s $1,800-buy-in Hollywood Poker Open regional main event.

It’s the fifth of seven stops in a tour that concludes in Las Vegas in June. Moneymaker, an event ambassador, comes into Charles Town fresh off a victory at the St. Louis regional event earlier this month.

Now 38 with three kids, Moneymaker is almost 11 years removed from his memorable World Series victory, when he unknowingly set off a poker boom by winning $2.5 million as a previously unknown accountant.

He stopped by The Baltimore Sun newsroom on Thursday afternoon to chat about his current life, the state of poker and what it’s like to always play with a target on his back.

Baltimore Sun: I guess there’s no better way to start than to look back to 2003. Does it feel like it’s been almost 11 years since you won the World Series?

Chris Moneymaker: Well, yeah, some kid told me at the last tournament I was in playing that, "When you won, I was 11."

It doesn’t feel like it was 11 years until someone reminds you. … When I’m playing against a kid who’s 21 and he’s telling me he was 11 or 12 when I won, it's like, "Aghhhh."

And of course the body feels old. Back when I was 28, I could play 60-hour sessions. Now, if I try to play a 10-hour session I’ve got to try to find a bed, because I’m just too old.

You mentioned the young guys. What do you think is the biggest thing that’s changed with the game in the past 11 years.

By far just the amount of knowledge that’s out there in the game and the resources that people have to improve on their game. Back in 2003, there were a handful of [poker] books and most of them had bad information. Now there’s hundreds, probably thousands of books. There’s training sites. There’s coaches. Someone who picks up the game today – if they’re serious about it – they can learn the right way to play in a short period of time, where they just didn’t have those tools available back in 2003 or prior. …

[Growing up] I played chess. I’m a little bit of a dork. Mostly I played soccer and wrestling, so I was real competitive. As I got older, again the body doesn’t work like it’s supposed to, so I couldn’t be as competitive as I wanted in those endeavors. So, I turned on to poker. One of the main reasons I play is that I like to mess with people’s heads and be competitive and manipulate people. It sounds really great when you put it in the paper.

I know you’ve embraced being an ambassador for poker since you won the World Series. Does it ever get cumbersome or annoying when you go to a tournament and everyone wants to shake your hand or take a photo or get an autograph.

No, I mean, it’s actually really cool. Because it was a big accomplishment and I know that I am representing the game of poker, and it is cool to have fans. I know when I’m going in there that it’s my job and that’s what I’m doing, so I embrace it. It’s always enjoyable.

What was the biggest challenge in trying to follow up that high of winning the World Series?

Well, the biggest challenge for me personally was that I don’t do public speaking. If you put six people in this room, I couldn’t have a conversation in front of them. They wanted me to go on David Letterman and do all this stuff and I was like … there’s no way in cold hell that I’m going to do that. That literally was my biggest fear, so getting over that hump personally was the biggest challenge.

Poker had the big boom after you won in 2003 and then it’s sort of leveled off in terms of interest. What is the state of the game, from your vantage point.

I think it’s at a good leveling point. The biggest thing that’s hurt poker is the Internet [poker websites] being taken away and, when the Internet gets taken away, the TV side of it gets taken away a bit.

The TV side probably got a little bit saturated with probably too many shows going on. But now there’s just not enough. There’s probably only one or two shows out there on TV. So, that needs to get back on. That’s what drives the popularity. …

Read more: Chris Moneymaker talks poker boom and current life before Hollywood Poker Open - baltimoresun-com
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
Manne wrote: Merge Gaming poker room PokerHost will reportedly be leaving the network and joining the Equity Poker Network (EPN) within the next couple of weeks.

US-facing affiliate site Professional Rakeback, which broke the news, estimates that Merge Gaming may lose 10% to 20% of its traffic as the result of the departure of PokerHost.

Ever since Merge adopted the Jazette cashier in November 2012, PokerHost has been marginalized within the network. PokerHost continued with its own cashier, but adopted Merge’s new VIP system later than the primary skins Carbon and Aced Poker.

PokerHost players were also recently excluded from the pools for the MTT schedule on Merge and were not able to participate in the recent Carbon Online Poker Series, making PokerHost’s MTT offering very weak.

The Equity Poker Network only launched in September last year. It retains access for US players, and operates as a cooperative where profits are shared between skins. A “shark tax” penalizes skins which bring too many players who win money from players on the other skins—an incentive to skins to recruit a balanced player pool.

The network has grown steadily and now boasts six poker rooms which manage an average of around 150 cash game players at the tables. Founder Clive Archer has just announced that the network has bought the Action Poker brand where Archer used to be CEO.

The likelihood is that there will be a change in the site rankings as EPN gains traffic and Merge loses. EPN is currently in fifth position, Merge is in third, sandwiching the Chico Poker Network.

Depending on how traffic shifts, Chico could emerge in third ahead of both Merge and EPN.

Players should be able to continue with PokerHost even if they have another account on a different EPN skin. The PokerHost cashier, with its segregated accounts will move with the poker room. At the moment, there is no information on how the transfer of VIP points and statuses will be managed.



PokerHost Leaves Merge for the Equity Poker Network | Pokerfuse Online Poker News
Is full flush poker part of the EPN?
Join: 2014/03/20 Messages: 1
Quote
0
Although it fell under the radar for the most part, Nevada’s gaming industry had an important milestone last week. February marked the first time ever that a Silver State gaming revenue report included online poker figures. The state was keeping the numbers under wraps until a third casino firm, South Point, started offering games. Station Casinos, which debuted games in spring 2013, and Caesars Entertainment, which kicked things off in late summer, are the other two.

In other words, from now on the successes or failures of Nevada’s online gaming industry will be out in the open for the public to see, every month.

Online poker play in Nevada during the month of February generated the state’s three operators a combined $824,000 in revenue, or the amount of money collected in rake from cash games and tournaments. It is worth noting that the figure was just a tiny drop in the bucket for overall casino win, which was $926 million for the month. That figure was a big decline year-over-year.

Casino win is the amount of money casinos won from gambling games. It doesn’t include revenue from things such as hotels and food and beverage sales.

Overall poker revenue in February, live and online, was $9,268,000 — up slightly from last year. Poker revenue for the calendar year (2013) jumped for the first time since 2007.

Station Casinos’ product was the first Nevada site to the market, and since its respective launch date $8.5 million in online poker has been realized between the three companies. Overall casino win, statewide, was $10.97 billion from Mar. 1, 2013 to Feb. 28, 2014.

The $8.5 million in online gaming revenue from April 30, 2013 to Feb. 28, 2014 is less than what New Jersey saw in the month of February alone, which was $10.3 million. New Jersey does allow more than just poker, however. Online poker for the Garden State was $3.1 million for February, about 3.8 times the size of Nevada. New Jersey’s games are much younger, though, starting in late November. The latter does have more operators.



Nevada Online Poker Sites Bring In $824,000 In February, Which Is Less Than One Tenth Of One Percent Of Overall Gaming Revenue
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
In March of last year, the New York Senate made headlines when it included the legalization of online poker in its initial version of the state budget, which many believe was inspired by New Jersey’s legalization of online gambling. Unfortunately, its inclusion in the budget did not have support in the state assembly and it subsequently disappeared.

Now, online poker is back in the New York Senate with the introduction of S 6913, a bill introduced Friday by Republican State Sen. John Bonacic. The poker-only bill seeks to “amend the racing, pari-mutuel wagering and breeding law and the penal law, in relation to allowing certain interactive poker games.”

The bill, currently with the Senate Committee on Racing, Gaming and Wagering, for which Bonacic is chair, looks to exclude poker from the state’s definition of “contest of chance.”

“Poker in many instances has been defined as a game of skill and a New York Federal Court in U.S. v. DiCristina … assessed that under federal law poker was predominantly a game of skill,” the bill explains. “New York courts have interpreted New York law to apply a more rigorous test in identifying a “contest of chance” than is applied by most states in this nation and the courts have found that where a contest pits the skill levels of the players against each other, those games are games of skill and not games of chance. Furthermore, the courts have not limited the legislature’s ability to determine that certain forms of poker should fall outside the general definition of gambling since those games are games of skill.”

The bill, which allows for the state to enter into interstate compacts, would allow for ten online poker licenses. Each license would cost $10 million and be good for ten years. Any company receiving a license would then have to pay a tax rate of 15% of gross gaming revenue.

The bill also includes a “Bad Actor” clause, which would bar any person or company that accepted wagers after the end of the year 2006, the same year the Unlawful Internet Gaming Enforcement Act (UIGEA) passed. PokerStars is currently facing “bad actor” opposition in its attempt to gain entry into California, which is largely regarded as the next state to pass iPoker legislation.

“With the passage of the Unlawful Internet Gaming Enforcement Act of 2006, issues concerning the scope and interpretation of state law, including the importance of the location of the wager, wagering activity and website, were clarified,” the bill states. “Those persons that provided goods or services related to Internet gambling involving New York citizens prior to the enactment of that statute, including, at the time, poker, which was until the adoption of this act unlawful, but exited in an expeditious fashion after its enactment should be regarded differently from those that continued to flout U.S. federal and New York law thereafter for purposes of suitability for licensing under this article.”

"The bill is a marker that New York is serious about getting into the online game and they don't want to be left behind," PocketFives has reported Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas saying. "The sponsor of the bill is the Chairman of the Senate Gaming Committee, but there is no House companion bill at this time. Getting House support will be critical and, without that, it will be a real challenge to have legislation considered this year. This is a great first step, but I think we are far from seeing this bill become law."




Online Poker Bill Introduced in New York State | PokerNews
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
Internet poker hasn’t proved so far to be the bonanza some had hoped for.

The first monthly report on online poker gaming win showed it exceeded only bingo compared to other casino games, slot machines and sports betting.

The state Gaming Control Board today approved applications from six companies to extend their internet poker, licenses which were to expire if the companies did not start the games online in Nevada within six months.

“People are weighing the market,” said A.G. Burnett, board chairman.

Ellen Whittemore, attorney for MGM Resorts Online – one of the companies granted an extended license – told the board it “was continuing to monitor” if the play picked up.

The gross win for the gaming companies offering interactive poker for February was $824,000, which exceeded bingo at $490,000. Burnett noted there were only three companies licensed to offer poker to Nevadans — South Point, Caesars Entertainment and Fertitta Interactive, which is tied to Station Casinos.

Jeff Silver, an attorney representing the Max in Las Vegas and the Carson Station in Carson City, told the board there were only 150 players online for the poker games at one time and 500 persons are needed.

Outside the meeting, he called it “a loser.”

To get a full-scale license for Internet poker, the state charges a $500,000 entrance fee and $250,000 a year. Silver indicated he hoped those taxes might be modified.

Still, the Max, formerly the Maxim in Las Vegas, and the Carson Station gained preliminary approval Wednesday to go forward toward a license if there are changes.

Rory Bedore, owner of the two properties, said his casinos needed to look at new ways to do business. He told the board he wanted to be in a situation to move quickly if online poker games picked up.

“I have no illusions that we would make a ton of money” but the interactive poker games would be used to as an advertisement to draw in customers.

Nevada and Delaware recently signed an agreement to allow poker players in each state to play online with companies that offer the games in the other state. So far there have not been any final agreements between companies in each of the states.

Delaware and New Jersey now allow full-scale gambling over the Internet for its residents.

Gov. Brian Sandoval says he does not support full-scale casino games to be offering to Nevadans. It should be only poker in Nevada, he said.

It’s up to the individual states to determine their own policies on Internet gaming, he said.

Those clubs recommended for extension of their licenses by the control board Wednesday were the Grand Siena and Boomtown Reno Truckstop, both in Reno, and MGM Resorts Online, Golden Nugget, Boyd Interactive Gaming and Z4Poker, all in Las Vegas.



Internet poker revenues outgaining only bingo, Nevada regulators report - Las Vegas Sun News
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
A New York State Assembly online poker bill was introduced by Rep. J. Gary Pretlow, as first reported by Gambling, as first reported by Scott Van Voorhis of Gamblingcompliance-com. The bill mirrors Senate Bill 6913 and is its Assembly companion bill. It has been referred to the Committee on Racing and Wagering.

The bill starts with a focus on how poker is a game of skill. It notes a New York Federal Court ruling in U.S. v. DiCristina. The bill states that the court “assessed that under federal law poker was predominantly a game of skill”. The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals later overturned the ruling. It also acknowledges that “the courts have not limited the legislature’s ability to determine that certain forms of poker should fall outside the general definition of gambling since those games are games of skill”.

Virtually all of language of the bill is taken word for word from S 6913. Texas Hold’em, Omaha, and similar games would be permitted. A bad actor clause with a date of December 31, 2006 is included. It would exclude any person, company, trade name and player database from New York regulated online poker that participated in unregulated online gambling after that date.

The tax rate would be 15 percent with a $10 million licensing fee. Unlicensed online poker providers would be committing a gambling offense under this bill and also be liable for any taxes owed on the action accepted from New York players.

The language of the bill may be found here.





New York Assembly Online Poker Bill Introduced |
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
If you’ve spent any time in online poker rooms, you’ve likely heard about a couple of high-profile attacks targeting players.

“With cybercrime on the rise, it is only a matter of time before hackers attempt to use malicious software to target poker players,” said Brian Corlisse of PokerSites-com, a leading guide to online poker sites. “Some poker pros have considerable balances in their poker accounts, sometimes with hundreds of thousands of dollars, and that makes it an attractive industry to target.”

“Stopping someone from hijacking your computer boils down to software and common sense,” said Charles Kolodgy, research vice president for secure products at IDC.

Reputable poker sites have invested in tight security measures, rivaling the sophisticated encryption used by financial institutions for online banking. But the onus lies on players to ensure their computers are protected from malicious types out to defraud you, Kolodgy said.

After all, more people might be more willing to ante up as legal and regulated online poker spreads. PokerAtlas-com, a site that boasts the largest source of poker room and game information in North America, predicts as many as a dozen states could allow residents to play on legal online poker sites by the end of 2015.

To help ward off cybercriminals, here are tips for protecting yourself while playing online poker, as well as other online activities.

Security suites, software updates

Don’t settle for a basic antivirus program you found for free or already bundled with your operating system. Instead, pick up a more robust anti-malware (“malicious software”) security suite that offers protection against viruses, worms, Trojans, keyloggers (which can remotely see what you’re typing), spam and identity theft.

“Especially for online poker players, a security suite — which includes a firewall — will help prevent someone from getting onto your machine,” said Kolodgy.

Good security suites might cost $50 per year, often for up to three PCs. Paid services usually are updated more often, so you’re always protected from the latest threats, and are updated automatically rather than you having to remember to download the latest malware definitions.

Use strong passwords

Creating a good password for online poker isn’t difficult, but it does take more time to come up with one than using common ones like “password,” “poker,” “123456” or your kids’ or pets’ names — all of which are not recommended for obvious reasons. A strong password is at least 7 or 8 characters long, has a combination of letters, numbers and symbols and mixes upper and lower cases. It’s also a good idea to avoid real words or phrases.

“And don’t think replacing a ‘1’ for an ‘i’ will protect you either, as good password cracking programs can also guess these,” warns Kolodgy. For example, passwords such as “p1ckle” or “h3llo” aren’t effective.

If you don’t want to use the recommended combination of letters, numbers and symbols, at least keep in mind that single-word passwords are easier to break than multiple word passwords. Instead of “giraffe,” use something like “bluegiraffe” or “sillybluegiraffeface.”

It’s also not a bad idea to set up a brand new email address — such as a free Gmail, Yahoo Mail or Outlook-com account — and only use that one associated with your poker account and nothing else.

Two-step authentication

Major tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Twitter and Apple offer a two-step authentication process — and some poker sites now do, too. This serves as an extra security measure to protect your online accounts from being compromised. It confirms you — and only you — are granted access to your account.

As the name “two-step authentication” suggests, in addition to a standard user name and password you’ll also need a code that’s sent usually via text message to your mobile phone, or revealed in an app. Before you gain access to the site or app, you’ll be prompted to enter that short, randomly generated verification code.

Some poker sites will send you a small gadget with a screen on it, such as the RSA SecurID products. This security token/key works the same way as a text message — displaying a randomly generated, one-time-use code to type in along with your password.

Don’t play as the admin

To be extra safe, Kolodgy said you only should play online poker on a PC you don’t have administration (admin) rights to. “That way, it makes it difficult for someone to secretly install a program on your PC while that session is on.”

Kolodgy said it’s fairly straightforward to set up a new account outside of admin on your machine, call it Poker, perhaps, and log into this before playing poker.

Resist public Wi-Fi hotspots

Whether it’s at your local coffee shop, in an airport or a hotel lobby, millions of mobile computer users take advantage of the free public Wi-Fi networks, or “hotspots.” But don’t use it for activities like online poker, banking or shopping.

Some Wi-Fi networks can appear to be legitimate — like a wireless network called “Hilton” or “McDonald’s” — when in fact it is a fake. Nearby criminals can create rogue networks that often contain the name of the store, hotel or airport, but actually will direct your information to their own computer. Before logging on, double-check it’s legit by confirming the network name at the establishment.

Always assume your Wi-Fi connections are being eavesdropped on. That is, if you’re surfing the Web on your computer, smartphone or tablet at a coffee shop, do simple things like read the news. Don’t enter sensitive data — such as your poker site password.






Online poker players need to protect themselves from cybercriminals
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
27 May 2014

The Equity Poker Network has announced that its FullFlushPoker-com flagship online poker room has withdrawn the full suite of online real-money gaming options for players in the regulated US states of New Jersey, Delaware and Nevada.

Players in the three regulated markets will be notified of the change in policy and have their accounts closed.

Players with existing FullFlushPoker-com accounts in the three states will be able to access their accounts to close out their balance.

FullFlushPoker-com said it would work quickly with players to return their funds.

The decision became effective on May 22.

In a statement, FullFlushPoker-com said: “We have taken this action in order to ensure that the vast majority of our customers, who do not reside in New Jersey, Nevada, or Delaware, continue to have access to our site and to enjoy playing the game that they love without disruption or inconvenience.

“Our priority still remains our players, and we’re proud to provide our loyal customers from around the globe with a fun and entertaining poker environment that they can trust, and that operates with the highest values of fairness, integrity and security.”





Equity Poker Network withdraws from US markets | iGaming Business
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
One of the most high-stakes, controversial and intriguing business stories in the history of the modern gambling industry is heading toward its conclusion. PokerStars, the world’s biggest online poker company, has agreed to sell itself for $4.9 billion to Amaya Gaming, a small publicly-traded Canadian supplier of gambling equipment.

The deal is being backed by Blackstone’s credit division, GSO Capital Partners, which will buy more than $675 million in convertible preferred shares and other securities. Deutsche Bank , Barclays and Macquarie Capital will provide $2.9 billion in credit facilities and other financing.

The deal marks the end of a remarkable story that began when Isai Scheinberg, an Israeli-Canadian former IBM IBM -0.57% computer programmer, founded PYR Software in Toronto and started building PokerStars. Through Scheinberg’s daring and will, PokerStars conquered the world’s online gambling market just as the poker boom exploded. His son, Mark Scheinberg, was also a big part of the business. Like other major online poker companies, such as PartyGaming and Full Tilt Poker, PokerStars expanded rapidly with the booming U.S. online poker market, which took off after an unknown Tennessee accountant called Chris Moneymaker became a millionaire and overnight sensation by winning the World Series of Poker’s Main Event in 2003. He got his seat at the World Series of Poker by winning an online PokerStars tournament.

The only problem: the U.S. Department of Justice had taken the position that online poker violated U.S. law, particularly the Wire Act. Still, PokerStars, which moved its headquarters to the Isle of Man, continued to operate in the U.S., pointing to legal opinions it obtained from prominent U.S. lawyers and law firms that said its operations did not violate U.S. law. PokerStars took over the U.S. market, the biggest single online poker market in the world by far, in earnest after President George W. Bush signed the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, causing PartyGaming to shut down its U.S. operations. Scheinberg kept his company operating in the U.S. and together with Full Tilt essentially owned American online poker.

But in 2011, federal prosecutors in Manhattan launched a massive crackdown against online poker in the U.S., indicting Scheinbeg, suing PokerStars and shutting down the U.S. operations of the company for operating an illegal gambling business. The crackdown exposed financial weaknesses at Full Tilt Poker, which collapsed under the weight of what the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan called a Ponzi scheme. In 2012, PokerStars struck a $731 million settlement with federal prosecutors that also saw the company acquire the assets of Full Tilt. Scheinberg remained under indictment and has not come to the U.S. to face the charges.

With the U.S. market essentially a non-factor and its toughest competitors essentially gone, PokerStars dominated online poker in the rest of the world. The company posted revenues of $1.1 billion last year and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of $420 million. But the company’s effort to reenter the vital U.S. market has proved difficult. The U.S. Department of Justice has reversed its position on the Wire Act and three states, most notably New Jersey, have launched regulated online gambling. The New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement suspended the review of PokerStars’ application for an online gambling license for two years, citing the company’s continued association with Scheinberg. Meanwhile in California, some gambling interests want to lock out companies like PokerStars that did business in the U.S. after the UIGEA was passed, an issue that has derailed momentum for online gambling in the most important potential state market. Big casino companies like Caesars Entertainment CZR -2.33% and MGM Resorts MGM -1.85% have launched online gambling units. In the end, it started to make sense for the Scheinbergs to sell.

The Scheinbergs will not remain with PokerStars in any capacity after the deal closes. In a statement announcing the deal, which includes both PokerStars and Full Tilt, Amaya said it believes the “transaction will expedite the entry of PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker into regulated markets in which Amaya already holds a footprint, particularly the U.S.A.”




Amaya Gaming In Deal To Buy PokerStars For $4.9 Billion - Forbes
Join: 2006/12/07 Messages: 29893
Quote
0
Manne wrote: 27 May 2014

The Equity Poker Network has announced that its FullFlushPoker-com flagship online poker room has withdrawn the full suite of online real-money gaming options for players in the regulated US states of New Jersey, Delaware and Nevada.

Players in the three regulated markets will be notified of the change in policy and have their accounts closed.

Players with existing FullFlushPoker-com accounts in the three states will be able to access their accounts to close out their balance.

FullFlushPoker-com said it would work quickly with players to return their funds.

The decision became effective on May 22.

In a statement, FullFlushPoker-com said: “We have taken this action in order to ensure that the vast majority of our customers, who do not reside in New Jersey, Nevada, or Delaware, continue to have access to our site and to enjoy playing the game that they love without disruption or inconvenience.

“Our priority still remains our players, and we’re proud to provide our loyal customers from around the globe with a fun and entertaining poker environment that they can trust, and that operates with the highest values of fairness, integrity and security.”





Equity Poker Network withdraws from US markets | iGaming Business
FFP operates with its players foremost in mind, and fair play for all customers is paramount. With these principles in mind, the recreational online poker site has decided to stop serving players who reside in New Jersey, Nevada, and Delaware due to the availability of a regulated poker market in those states.

This decision takes effect today with players in these regulated U.S. markets set to receive email notification of the change in policy, and confirmation that their account will be closed. Players with existing FFP accounts who reside in these three states will have access to them to close out their balances. FFP will work quickly to return player funds to those affected.
Join: 2014/07/31 Messages: 34
Quote
0
Manne wrote: If you’ve spent any time in online poker rooms, you’ve likely heard about a couple of high-profile attacks targeting players.

“With cybercrime on the rise, it is only a matter of time before hackers attempt to use malicious software to target poker players,” said Brian Corlisse of PokerSites-com, a leading guide to online poker sites. “Some poker pros have considerable balances in their poker accounts, sometimes with hundreds of thousands of dollars, and that makes it an attractive industry to target.”

“Stopping someone from hijacking your computer boils down to software and common sense,” said Charles Kolodgy, research vice president for secure products at IDC.

Reputable poker sites have invested in tight security measures, rivaling the sophisticated encryption used by financial institutions for online banking. But the onus lies on players to ensure their computers are protected from malicious types out to defraud you, Kolodgy said.

After all, more people might be more willing to ante up as legal and regulated online poker spreads. PokerAtlas-com, a site that boasts the largest source of poker room and game information in North America, predicts as many as a dozen states could allow residents to play on legal online poker sites by the end of 2015.

To help ward off cybercriminals, here are tips for protecting yourself while playing online poker, as well as other online activities.

Security suites, software updates

Don’t settle for a basic antivirus program you found for free or already bundled with your operating system. Instead, pick up a more robust anti-malware (“malicious software”) security suite that offers protection against viruses, worms, Trojans, keyloggers (which can remotely see what you’re typing), spam and identity theft.

“Especially for online poker players, a security suite — which includes a firewall — will help prevent someone from getting onto your machine,” said Kolodgy.

Good security suites might cost $50 per year, often for up to three PCs. Paid services usually are updated more often, so you’re always protected from the latest threats, and are updated automatically rather than you having to remember to download the latest malware definitions.

Use strong passwords

Creating a good password for online poker isn’t difficult, but it does take more time to come up with one than using common ones like “password,” “poker,” “123456” or your kids’ or pets’ names — all of which are not recommended for obvious reasons. A strong password is at least 7 or 8 characters long, has a combination of letters, numbers and symbols and mixes upper and lower cases. It’s also a good idea to avoid real words or phrases.

“And don’t think replacing a ‘1’ for an ‘i’ will protect you either, as good password cracking programs can also guess these,” warns Kolodgy. For example, passwords such as “p1ckle” or “h3llo” aren’t effective.

If you don’t want to use the recommended combination of letters, numbers and symbols, at least keep in mind that single-word passwords are easier to break than multiple word passwords. Instead of “giraffe,” use something like “bluegiraffe” or “sillybluegiraffeface.”

It’s also not a bad idea to set up a brand new email address — such as a free Gmail, Yahoo Mail or Outlook-com account — and only use that one associated with your poker account and nothing else.

Two-step authentication

Major tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Twitter and Apple offer a two-step authentication process — and some poker sites now do, too. This serves as an extra security measure to protect your online accounts from being compromised. It confirms you — and only you — are granted access to your account.

As the name “two-step authentication” suggests, in addition to a standard user name and password you’ll also need a code that’s sent usually via text message to your mobile phone, or revealed in an app. Before you gain access to the site or app, you’ll be prompted to enter that short, randomly generated verification code.

Some poker sites will send you a small gadget with a screen on it, such as the RSA SecurID products. This security token/key works the same way as a text message — displaying a randomly generated, one-time-use code to type in along with your password.

Don’t play as the admin

To be extra safe, Kolodgy said you only should play online poker on a PC you don’t have administration (admin) rights to. “That way, it makes it difficult for someone to secretly install a program on your PC while that session is on.”

Kolodgy said it’s fairly straightforward to set up a new account outside of admin on your machine, call it Poker, perhaps, and log into this before playing poker.

Resist public Wi-Fi hotspots

Whether it’s at your local coffee shop, in an airport or a hotel lobby, millions of mobile computer users take advantage of the free public Wi-Fi networks, or “hotspots.” But don’t use it for activities like online poker, banking or shopping.

Some Wi-Fi networks can appear to be legitimate — like a wireless network called “Hilton” or “McDonald’s” — when in fact it is a fake. Nearby criminals can create rogue networks that often contain the name of the store, hotel or airport, but actually will direct your information to their own computer. Before logging on, double-check it’s legit by confirming the network name at the establishment.

Always assume your Wi-Fi connections are being eavesdropped on. That is, if you’re surfing the Web on your computer, smartphone or tablet at a coffee shop, do simple things like read the news. Don’t enter sensitive data — such as your poker site password.






Online poker players need to protect themselves from cybercriminals
“Stopping someone from hijacking your computer boils down to software and common sense”
Reputable poker sites have invested in tight security measures, rivaling the sophisticated encryption used by financial institutions for online banking. But the onus lies on players to ensure their computers are protected from malicious types out to defraud you, Kolodgy said.
Join: 2014/07/31 Messages: 34
Quote
0
Manne wrote: A New York State Assembly online poker bill was introduced by Rep. J. Gary Pretlow, as first reported by Gambling, as first reported by Scott Van Voorhis of Gamblingcompliance-com. The bill mirrors Senate Bill 6913 and is its Assembly companion bill. It has been referred to the Committee on Racing and Wagering.

The bill starts with a focus on how poker is a game of skill. It notes a New York Federal Court ruling in U.S. v. DiCristina. The bill states that the court “assessed that under federal law poker was predominantly a game of skill”. The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals later overturned the ruling. It also acknowledges that “the courts have not limited the legislature’s ability to determine that certain forms of poker should fall outside the general definition of gambling since those games are games of skill”.

Virtually all of language of the bill is taken word for word from S 6913. Texas Hold’em, Omaha, and similar games would be permitted. A bad actor clause with a date of December 31, 2006 is included. It would exclude any person, company, trade name and player database from New York regulated online poker that participated in unregulated online gambling after that date.

The tax rate would be 15 percent with a $10 million licensing fee. Unlicensed online poker providers would be committing a gambling offense under this bill and also be liable for any taxes owed on the action accepted from New York players.

The language of the bill may be found here.





New York Assembly Online Poker Bill Introduced |
Can you tell me that what is the Licensing Process of online poker bill in NewYork?
Join: 2014/07/31 Messages: 34
Quote
0
Manne wrote: Internet poker hasn’t proved so far to be the bonanza some had hoped for.

The first monthly report on online poker gaming win showed it exceeded only bingo compared to other casino games, slot machines and sports betting.

The state Gaming Control Board today approved applications from six companies to extend their internet poker, licenses which were to expire if the companies did not start the games online in Nevada within six months.

“People are weighing the market,” said A.G. Burnett, board chairman.

Ellen Whittemore, attorney for MGM Resorts Online – one of the companies granted an extended license – told the board it “was continuing to monitor” if the play picked up.

The gross win for the gaming companies offering interactive poker for February was $824,000, which exceeded bingo at $490,000. Burnett noted there were only three companies licensed to offer poker to Nevadans — South Point, Caesars Entertainment and Fertitta Interactive, which is tied to Station Casinos.

Jeff Silver, an attorney representing the Max in Las Vegas and the Carson Station in Carson City, told the board there were only 150 players online for the poker games at one time and 500 persons are needed.

Outside the meeting, he called it “a loser.”

To get a full-scale license for Internet poker, the state charges a $500,000 entrance fee and $250,000 a year. Silver indicated he hoped those taxes might be modified.

Still, the Max, formerly the Maxim in Las Vegas, and the Carson Station gained preliminary approval Wednesday to go forward toward a license if there are changes.

Rory Bedore, owner of the two properties, said his casinos needed to look at new ways to do business. He told the board he wanted to be in a situation to move quickly if online poker games picked up.

“I have no illusions that we would make a ton of money” but the interactive poker games would be used to as an advertisement to draw in customers.

Nevada and Delaware recently signed an agreement to allow poker players in each state to play online with companies that offer the games in the other state. So far there have not been any final agreements between companies in each of the states.

Delaware and New Jersey now allow full-scale gambling over the Internet for its residents.

Gov. Brian Sandoval says he does not support full-scale casino games to be offering to Nevadans. It should be only poker in Nevada, he said.

It’s up to the individual states to determine their own policies on Internet gaming, he said.

Those clubs recommended for extension of their licenses by the control board Wednesday were the Grand Siena and Boomtown Reno Truckstop, both in Reno, and MGM Resorts Online, Golden Nugget, Boyd Interactive Gaming and Z4Poker, all in Las Vegas.



Internet poker revenues outgaining only bingo, Nevada regulators report - Las Vegas Sun News
Internet poker hasn't proved so far to be the bonanza some had hoped for. The first monthly report on online poker gaming win showed it exceeded only bingo compared to other casino games, slot machines.
Join: 2014/07/31 Messages: 34
Quote
0
Manne wrote: For most in the poker community Lock Poker’s time is officially up.

Lock Poker has always had its naysayers, but in the past year the site has devolved from just another occasionally maligned online poker room to being nearly unanimously condemned by the entire poker community.

With withdrawal times that stretch back over a year in some cases, and with a list of players owed in the neighborhood of $1 million, the once-prominent and always controversial US-facing online poker room has officially gone off the rails.

Now the poker world is looking for answers. I recently had the chance to speak with someone who has some of these answers, a former Lock Poker Pro who wished to remain nameless.
Pulling back the curtain

“Lock wasn’t always a nightmare,” said the anonymous pro.

I was told the company wasn’t always bad, or at least didn’t appear to be from the point of view of someone on the inside.

“Even when Lock was having speedy cashouts and was a growing site they had a ton of negative PR on 2+2 and via word of mouth, which was ridiculous,” my source explained.

This heavy criticism, which the company and its pros viewed as unwarranted, had an unintended consequence as it “caused a lot of the staff and the pros to not give a shit what people were saying on 2+2,” the former Lock Pro told me.

This outspokenness and speculation allowed Lock Poker to dispel any worries about cashouts as some of the other rumors were simply not true and the staff and pros knew it.

“Lock was always communicating to start with. They were always telling the pros that player funds were segregated and that they were processing many cashouts,” the source said.

And on the occasions Lock was asked for more details – and I was told some of the pros were pressing Lock Poker about this issue – Lock Poker explained that it would use the mistrust of the forums to their advantage, telling their more skeptical pros, “The forums were the minority and they were constantly processing cashouts.”

A sea of red flags

“A few months into 2013 I starting really suspecting something was up,” said the former Lock Pro.

The forums may have gotten some of the small things wrong, but Lock’s critics also had a lot of the big things right, especially the biggest issue – cashouts and the safety of player funds at Lock Poker.

At various points in 2013 even the pros that were the most mistrustful of the forums began to worry that all was not as they had been told.

According to my source:

“I think New Years of 2013 is when I heard that cashouts were slowing down, and then about a few months into 2013 I started really suspecting something was up.

Some of the pros were skeptical to begin with. Almost everyone was skeptical towards the middle of the year.

I thought that Lock was going to pay out all their players but it would just take a long time. I always believed that Lock funds were safe. Lock Pros were always told that the funds were segregated and that the company only had problems cashing out players.

Inevitably it just ended up being a PR scheme to the pros as well.”

Expedited Cashouts

“If a pro got a check or Skrill withdrawal every two months, how would they really know it was being expedited?” the onetime Lock Pro asked.

One of the hot topics on 2+2 concerning Lock Poker after it became apparent the site was unable to pay its players was whether sponsored pros and other high priority individuals were receiving expedited cashouts, something some of the pros who were willing to post on 2+2 scoffed at.

But it turns out this was likely a service many of them were either knowingly or unknowingly receiving.

“Pros were expedited cashouts. Even if they didn’t realize it, they were. A lot of them didn’t know they were being expedited because they didn’t follow 2+2,” the Lock Pro stated, further explaining, “If a pro got a check or Skrill withdrawal every two months – which seems very slow – how would they really know it was being expedited?”
Were people driving down the price of Lock funds?

“The only reason the price was dropping so fast was because Lock was taking forever to pay out,” my source told me.

Another kerfuffle that arose during this time, and one of Lock’s go-to excuses for closing several high-profile accounts and changing their cashout policy, was whether people were taking advantage of their expedited cashout status and buying up Lock funds on the cheap, in the process further driving down the price.

“By this time (early to mid 2013) 2+2 knew for certain the site was broke…with no real proof of course, and Lock was still selling at about 80 cents on the dollar which means that some people were getting hefty cashouts, otherwise it would have been much lower,” the former Lock Pro explained.

The Pro went on to say, “I heard of one non-pro getting biweekly Skrill withdrawals for $10k. He would purposely drive the price down on 2+2 and buy as much as he could on the site, then he would rake $20k or more per month to keep getting the expedited cashouts. He was making $20k a month just by working the system.”

So how does one drive down the price of Lock funds?

“Someone who wants to drive the price down just has to be very active on 2+2. There are many ways to do it.

They can fake long withdrawal times. They can start rumors that Lock had all of its funds seized from foreign banks or frozen from processors being shut down. They can also just keep posting that they are buying funds at .05 lower than market rate, that almost always will drive the funds down.

Ultimately though the only reason the price was dropping so fast was because Lock was taking forever to pay out.

Many poker players don’t have money and they relied on getting funds off just to live. If someone has bills to pay and has 50k on Lock they will sell at .05 lower just to get their money off.”

So while certain people may have been artificially driv
Lock Poker has always had its naysayers, but in the past year the site has devolved from just another occasionally maligned online poker room to being nearly unanimously condemned by the entire poker community.
Join: 2014/07/31 Messages: 34
Quote
0

New posts