tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
Thats not strategy, its just show-down.
It is all a game of "chance" by doing that... and chances are...
you will eventually get ko'd (and deservedly so).
scotchface wrote:
Thats not strategy, its just show-down.
It is all a game of "chance" by doing that... and chances are...
you will eventually get ko'd (and deservedly so).
Skill should be coupled with chance... imho.
Scotch
Those type of tournaments intrigue me somewhat. I would probably play where you get the choice of all-in or fold for fun with friends. Those tournaments where its all in every hand look funny.
I did do that last night once I was heads up in a freeroll. I was down 5-1 in chips and told my opponent that I was going all in the rest of the way every hand. Was tired and late for bed. Won 1st place after 20 hands or so... :1orglaugh
tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
[FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium]Someone who is playing all-in every hand is not playing poker. They're playing Russian roulette. . .and hoping that the bullet is not in the chamber when they pull the trigger. Or rather hoping that the bullet is in your chamber if you call. . .[/FONT]
tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
You are better off betting on a random dog in a greyhound race I would say. Them types of tourneys are just a glorified fruit machine. Although I am starting to think the same of regular online poker sadly.
Still love poker and love this site for providing freerolls. Great stuff
moneylife wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
You are better off betting on a random dog in a greyhound race I would say. Them types of tourneys are just a glorified fruit machine. Although I am starting to think the same of regular online poker sadly.
Still love poker and love this site for providing freerolls. Great stuff
Is a good tactic against the tight tables at the time when the BB is already quite high
tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
In big tournaments is necessary double your chips inthe firsts blinds?
andreipearce wrote:
In big tournaments is necessary double your chips inthe firsts blinds?
All in all the time only a matter of time before your all out of chips and wondering what went wrong . sure there are times when allins are called for but all the time is suicide waiting to happen .
onpokplaya wrote:
All in all the time only a matter of time before your all out of chips and wondering what went wrong . sure there are times when allins are called for but all the time is suicide waiting to happen .
Kamikaze
I dont know why I even throw my buck in the hat
probably tried it
a dozen different times
& cashed once
mexican wrote:
All in all the time can work sometimes but then again it depends on the type of player......some just don't have what it takes!
It's not poker, it's a game of chance. There's times you have to do it, but it should be a last resort. I've seen some guys try it early in a toruney, but I've never seen them make a final table.
lcid86 wrote:
It's not poker, it's a game of chance. There's times you have to do it, but it should be a last resort. I've seen some guys try it early in a toruney, but I've never seen them make a final table.
I thought he was talking about them All-in Tourneys where you get 1 chip each and the blinds are massive so every hand is allin until the end. I entered one a couple times and it is crap.
tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
That sounds like the kamakazi tourneys i mentioned in my post
lcid86 wrote:
It's not poker, it's a game of chance. There's times you have to do it, but it should be a last resort. I've seen some guys try it early in a toruney, but I've never seen them make a final table.
When I first started playing online poker at PokerStars, I would play the play money cash tables. I would find tables that played all-in or fold. It was a lot of fun, but for real money no way. Unless it is heads up, an all-in is to risky when a multipot is being played. I would likely wait for a good hand that I feel confident about. X
tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
All in every hand is not a strategy. The result of play like that is that you will be disliked by all others for the short amount of time you are in the game. Try a BINGO Hall or buy scratch off lottery tickets
tahmelapashme wrote:
Can You anybody check this strategy - every hands play on all-in?
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?
I don't even like all in or fold tourneys... played in a couple just for fun, but not much skill involved in all in or fold. No skill involved in all in all the time LOL!:thumbsup
I personally a little affraid is no future, but... maybe i'm wrong?