mike1
1758
2014/01/15 09:09
#311500
Manne wrote:
Contrary to popular thought, athletes can't sully great legacies by staying in the game too long and not knowing when to retire or stay retired.
They can damage their bodies and brains, perhaps, by not knowing when to quit but loving your craft so much you don't know when to stop is not a character flaw. Making excuses and vainly trying to diminish the accomplishments of your opponents, however, is a sure-fire way to tarnish even the shiniest legacy.
While we were busy wishing former UFC middleweight champion Anderson Silva a speedy and full recovery and hoping that he ultimately makes the best decision for himself on whether or not he should ever attempt a return to professional fighting after having his leg shattered by Chris Weidman last month, "The Spider" has begun to sully his reputation with delusional comments.
Silva was recently interviewed by Brazilian outlet Globo and MMA Fighting's Guilherme Cruz translated the fighter's comments. Barring any huge mix up in translation, it appears that Silva has taken an excuse-making, deluded note or two from former rival Chael Sonnen.
"I don’t think [Weidman should consider it a win]," Silva said.
"It was an accident. And I’m pretty sure I would have won the fight."
Deep breath. Alright.
We love Anderson Silva. The all-time great might very well be the best mixed martial artist in history and he has nothing left to prove. That's why it is so frustrating to read such insecure words from the former champion.
Let's recap Silva's two fights with Chris Weidman. In the first round of the first fight, Weidman took Silva down with ease and then smacked him around on the ground.
After Weidman went for and missed a leg lock attempt, Silva got back to his feet. In the second round, Silva tried in vain to mount his own offense with strikes on the feet but could not find the bobbing and weaving Weidman (save for a few hard leg kicks. Let's remember those...) before getting knocked out by the challenger.
In the first round of their second fight, Silva was again taken down in the first round with ease. Once again, he was battered on his back. When he got back to his feet, Weidman actually knocked him out with a short right hand.
The referee did not notice that Silva was out because once his head hit the mat after falling. Weidman hit him some more on the ground. When they got back to their feet in the second round, Anderson threw some leg kicks that Weidman checked.
One of those kick-checks shattered Silva's leg.
Over nearly four rounds, Weidman has dominated almost every second against Silva, knocked him down three times and out twice. If Weidman is "lucky" as Silva suggests, the Long Islander should invest all his money in lottery tickets.
Silva went on, digging his embarrassing hole deeper.
"I can see some technical mistakes I did in the fight," he said.
"To land the perfect kick, I needed to distract him by punching him in the face so he wouldn’t pay attention to the kick. He was protecting the upper part of his body, and he raised leg instinctively. The kick was so strong he lost balance."
So, Silva is now bragging about the kick that may end his career? Saying that leg kick where he broke his own leg in two places was so strong it made Weidman lose balance is like bragging that you bruised a guy's fist when he knocked you out.
Silva is correct in saying that he did not set up his leg kicks with punches. We're not sure why that is supposed to be some major and new observation.
You set crosses up with jabs and kicks up with punches. That's not new to mixed martial arts.
For years, however, Silva has gotten away with not throwing his leg kicks behind punches and from the type of stance that one would ordinarily. He was so much better and quicker and stronger than every other opponent that he was able to get away with those slapping, not set up kicks for years.
Silva could not get away with that the second time around against Weidman, however, so he lost. The fact of the matter is that it appears that Weidman can beat Silva any number of ways, because he already has.
No shame in that for Silva. Weidman is a decade younger, much bigger and has a skill-set that matches up well against Silva.
"I saw my mistake, and now I’m only worried about my comeback," Silva went on.
"If the UFC thinks I deserve another opportunity [against Weidman] or if I need to earn it, I just want to do what I do, it doesn’t matter if it’s for the title or not. I want to do what I do well."
We hope you heal up fully Anderson, and that, if you want to, you fight again. But please, stop wrecking the respect you've earned with your actions through classless words.
Y! SPORTS
Join:
2006/12/11
Messages:
1758
And now I was staring out at the shadowy snow and multihued blur of holiday lights, the cold tracks rumbling beneath me, and an incredulously self-critical question kept running around my head: "What the hell was I thinking?"
When the topic of Fighter of the Year had come up during the TV show, I had blurted out a name that on the most obvious level made perfect sense. The guy fought three times in 2013, won three times in 2013, viciously knocked out three opponents in 2013, each one with a highlight-reel kick to the head. So I had cast my vote for Vitor Belfort.
What the hell was I thinking?
What I was thinking was that the resume items listed above were impressive enough. And they were indeed remarkable. But they're only part of the 2013 Vitor Belfort story, and they are undeniably tied in to the other part: He's one of the growing number of aging fighters who've prolonged their careers by use of testosterone replacement therapy. And the brawny Brazilian stands out from the crowd. At 38 years old, he's more of a caged killer now than he was in the prime years of his 20s. Three straight head-kick KO's over Top 10 guys? He wasn't doing that 10 years ago.
A decade ago, Belfort was known for beating people up, but he wasn't taking our breath away in quite the same way. "The Phenom" was a young man fighting like a young man ... until he no longer was. After winning the UFC light heavyweight championship in 2004, everything suddenly went south. Belfort entered a stretch during which he lost five of seven bouts and appeared to be fading out of the picture. That perception became starkly vivid when, following the 2006 decision loss to Dan Henderson that culminated his slide, Vitor tested positive for the anabolic steroid 4-Hydroxytestosterone.
Since 2007, though, Belfort is 10-2, with losses coming against only the estimable Anderson Silva and Jon Jones. He's fought like a different fighter and even looked like one. His sinewy physique and ageless vigor have raised eyebrows. Would Belfort have had the energy to put in the gym hours needed to chisel out such a figure if not for the TRT boost? Would his dynamic blitzkrieg fighting style still have been possible as he entered his late 30s?
My argument on the TV show, to which I'd given considerable thought, was that with TRT exemptions being routinely granted to fighters by athletic commissions, there's nothing inherently wrong with Belfort's use. "It's within the rules," I had said. "He's not cheating."
That's true. But even as I was stating the case for Belfort, I was situating him within a more nuanced context. The panelist who spoke before me had endorsed flyweight champion Demetrious Johnson, and when it was my turn I had used that as a jumping-off point. "I'm going to say that Demetrious Johnson is my organic, all-natural Fighter of the Year, sponsored by Whole Foods Market ..." I began, whimsically, before veering toward Belfort.
Upon further review, I believe I should have stayed with Johnson. Nothing against Vitor, whose three victories this year were awe-inspiring, but he's running on high-octane fuel in a race against vehicles with tanks full of regular unleaded. At some point, athletic commissions and MMA's most influential promotion, the UFC, will resolve themselves to doing away with artificial enhancement and allow fighters to simply age out of the sport, as nature intended. Till that happens, TRT-fueled fighters will continue to do what they do. Among the things they will continue to do: pose a dilemma for those of us who each year try to sort out the criteria for determining who's the best of the best.
So, during my train ride home, I got to thinking about the story you're now reading. Not just the story but the photos that would accompany it. I sat there and pictured the MMA/Boxing page of SI.com with a headline playing off the Fighter of the Year award, and on this imagined page would be a picture of Belfort, his physique bursting out of himself in a way a 38-year-old athlete's simply doesn't ... especially if his physique didn't do so at age 28. And when I finished with the "What the hell was I thinking?" self-battering, I whispered to myself, audible to the iPod-listening person across the aisle from me, "No, no, no."
No, Vitor Belfort is not my Fighter of the Year. I take it back, viewers ofThe MMA Beat. I congratulate Belfort on those breathtaking KO's of Michael Bisping, Luke Rockhold, and Dan Henderson. But just as the UFC is prone to skip over challengers to hand title shots to fighters it believes will best serve the bottom line, I'm skipping over Vitor Belfort. I don't care if TRT is within the rules. I'm factoring it in.
So ... no. Simply ... no.
Who's the Fighter of the Year, then?
Let's go with "the organic, all-natural" Johnson. "Mighty Mouse" didn't head-kick an opponent into oblivion in any of his three 2013 victories, but two weekends ago he did send shivers through all of us who watched him starch Joseph Benavidez with a potent fight hand just two minutes onto their flyweight title fight. In his defense just prior, in July, lightning-quick Demetrious dominated John Moraga -- 71 percent accuracy on significant strikes, 12 takedowns, 13 guard passes -- before submitting the challenger. And back in January the 27-year-old Johnson,