Select your timezone:
Select

Dustin Brown - Barrere Gregoire

03/24 16:00 tennisclub -8.00
2021/03/24 10:56 Dustin Brown (+4.0 Game's) @-141 8/10
 

Lille challenger, round of 16, indoors

Bet in which i see a lot of logic and value and regarding D. Brown i feel save. We all know D. Brown and his playing style.

Why i choose D. Brown?

1. In first match he showed that he can serve really well and mostly winningly with ace. Also court is suited for him and servers.
2. On other side his Opponent had some problems with serve and return so thats a good thing for us (7 DF)
3. French guy also had been not so succesful with returns.

G. Barrere is not very spectacular or impressive, he just plays simple tennis, he have problems with returns, he likes to play fast short rallies and some times make to much errors.

And this type of play suits us today, because D. Brown will make him move and have great serve.

4) h2h is on our side.


In the end i dont say that french is bad player, not at all. He is favorite and have a lot of qualities to win, but i think that wont be easy.

  • Voted: 4
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

tennisclub

Thanks: 286

Followers: 12

  • Units 120.51
  • ROI 2.59%
  • W% 55.49%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 565
  • Units won: 5097.51
  • W-L-T : 293-235-37
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.81
  • Staked units: 4977.00
  • Avg. Odds: -115
 

Unit change

1701581461341221102025 June2026 May

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Related picks (1)

    (Tristan Boyer) @175 8/10
    A very and even very high coefficient for the American. Although Boyer's results are very poor on the sand, he seems to be doing very well in this tournament. He has beaten Svrcina and other not-so-good tennis players and his serving game looks quite confident. The Spanish young player faced very weak opponents and although clay is a preferred surface, the American is clearly ahead in skill, so it is worth taking him with this coefficient.
    Read less
    Read more

Comments (0)