Select your timezone:
Select

Zdenek Kolar - Vilius Gaubas

10/04 11:10 tennisclub -5.00
2025/10/04 07:44 (Zdenek Kolar) @2.000 5/10
 

Braga Challenger.

It's difficult to decide which player is better, although Vilnius has been showing good results and has been surprising more and more as of late, but he is still young and is sure to make mistakes, and this match may have more errors than usual. I'll start with Zdenek, who had a lot of problems in 2024 and had to be without tennis for months at a time. He made a good comeback, with 2 wins at ITF clay tournaments and 1 at Challenger level. He had good runs at other tournaments as well. His main surface is clay, he is an active player who often outpaces his opponents with speed and defense. Vilnius is currently in good form, but every match in this tournament has shown both his good and bad sides. In yesterday's match, there were some errors due to misjudging situations, and his opponent always had a miraculous shot. Yes, he managed to win all of his matches, but his opponents weren't necessarily better, as they allowed Vilnius to come back and win. In my opinion, Vilnius will play aggressively and try to finish points quickly, as playing three sets again could be challenging for him. Meanwhile, Zdenek can expect that Vilnius will play quickly and aggressively, so he will likely slow down the game and make it more difficult for Vilnius. I think that an aggressive game will cost a lot of points, and if it's not successful, it could mean a loss or a long, tough match, giving Zdenek the advantage.

  • Voted: 2
 
PRISIJUNKITE https://t.me/statymaigroup
18+ | T&C Apply | Play Responsibly

tennisclub

Thanks: 285

Followers: 12

  • Units 127.60
  • ROI 2.78%
  • W% 55.68%

Last 10 picks:

 
  • Total picks: 556
  • Units won: 5049.60
  • W-L-T : 289-230-37
  • Avg.Stake of Units: 8.85
  • Staked units: 4922.00
  • Avg. Odds: 1.868
 

Unit change

1701581461341221102024 November2025 October

Sports statistics by category

Bookmaker statistics

Statistics by month

Statistic by stake

Comments (0)